Demographics details for Marshall, MI vs Cole camp, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, MI vs Cole camp, MO.
| Data | Marshall | Cole camp |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,753 | 1,149 |
| Median Age | 45.4 years | 47.2 years |
| Median Income | $72,813 | $40,192 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Cole camp
- In Marshall, the population is higher at 6,753, compared to 1,149 in Cole camp.
- The median age in Cole camp is higher at 47.2 years, compared to 45.4 years in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher median income of $72,813 compared to $40,192 in Cole camp.
- In Cole camp, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 43.0% in Marshall.
- The poverty level is higher in Cole camp at 12%, compared to 9% in Marshall.
- The unemployment rate in Marshall is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Cole camp.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Cole camp provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marshall | Cole camp |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 94 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 2 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Cole camp
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Marshall and Cole camp at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cole camp at 100% compared to 94% in Marshall.
- Both Marshall and Cole camp have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Marshall at 4% compared to 0% in Cole camp.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Marshall at 2% compared to 0% in Cole camp.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Marshall and Cole camp at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marshall | Cole camp |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 22.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 37.5% | 42.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Cole camp
- In Cole camp, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Marshall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Marshall at 25.2% compared to 24.7% in Cole camp.
- Cole camp has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 17.3% in Marshall.
- Binge drinking is more common in Marshall at 18.0% compared to 16.6% in Cole camp.
- Cole camp has higher obesity rates at 42.4% compared to 37.5% in Marshall.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cole camp at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Marshall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marshall | Cole camp |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (46) | 0.4% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (1,067) | 31.4% (361) |
| Less than High School | 7.3% (493) | 10.6% (122) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.1% (2,233) | 14.4% (166) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Cole camp
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Cole camp.
- In Cole camp, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.4% compared to 15.8% in Marshall.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cole camp at 10.6%, compared to 7.3% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 14.4% in Cole camp.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.