Demographics details for Marshall, AR vs Heppner, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, AR vs Heppner, OR.
| Data | Marshall | Heppner |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,339 | 1,172 |
| Median Age | 52.3 years | 39.1 years |
| Median Income | $28,290 | $46,708 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Heppner
- In Marshall, the population is higher at 1,339, compared to 1,172 in Heppner.
- Residents in Marshall have a higher median age of 52.3 years compared to 39.1 years in Heppner.
- Heppner has a higher median income of $46,708, compared to $28,290 in Marshall.
- In Heppner, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 33.0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 10% in Heppner.
- Heppner has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.2% in Marshall.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Heppner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marshall | Heppner |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 84 | 86 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Heppner
- In Heppner, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Heppner at 86% compared to 84% in Marshall.
- Both Marshall and Heppner have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Heppner has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Marshall.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Marshall at 12% compared to 7% in Heppner.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Marshall at 1% compared to 0% in Heppner.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marshall | Heppner |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.7% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.2% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 29.8% | 27.6% |
| Smoking | 27.2% | 16.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 39.2% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 35.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Heppner
- More residents in Marshall report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 18.5% in Heppner.
- Depression is more prevalent in Marshall at 29.8% compared to 27.6% in Heppner.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Marshall at 27.2% compared to 16.2% in Heppner.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Heppner at 18.2% compared to 14.7% in Marshall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Marshall at 39.2% compared to 34.4% in Heppner.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Heppner at 35.0% compared to 30.0% in Marshall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marshall | Heppner |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (12) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 27.9% (373) | 22.0% (258) |
| Less than High School | 32.4% (434) | 9.4% (110) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (156) | 9.8% (115) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Heppner
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Heppner.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a high school diploma at 27.9% compared to 22.0% in Heppner.
- More residents in Marshall have less than a high school education at 32.4% compared to 9.4% in Heppner.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 9.8% in Heppner.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.