Demographics details for Marshall, AR vs Hazel park, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, AR vs Hazel park, MI.
| Data | Marshall | Hazel park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,339 | 14,838 |
| Median Age | 52.3 years | 37.2 years |
| Median Income | $28,290 | $59,576 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Hazel park
- The population in Hazel park is higher at 14,838, compared to 1,339 in Marshall.
- Residents in Marshall have a higher median age of 52.3 years compared to 37.2 years in Hazel park.
- Hazel park has a higher median income of $59,576, compared to $28,290 in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Marshall at 33.0% compared to 30.0% in Hazel park.
- Marshall has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 15% in Hazel park.
- The unemployment rate in Marshall is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.1% in Hazel park.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Hazel park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marshall | Hazel park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 10 |
| White | 84 | 72 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Hazel park
- In Hazel park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 72% in Hazel park.
- In Hazel park, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Marshall.
- Hazel park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Marshall.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Marshall at 12% compared to 10% in Hazel park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Marshall at 1% compared to 0% in Hazel park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marshall | Hazel park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.7% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.2% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 29.8% | 24.2% |
| Smoking | 27.2% | 22.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 39.2% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Hazel park
- More residents in Marshall report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 18.9% in Hazel park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Marshall at 29.8% compared to 24.2% in Hazel park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Marshall at 27.2% compared to 22.0% in Hazel park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hazel park at 17.1% compared to 14.7% in Marshall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Marshall at 39.2% compared to 35.9% in Hazel park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Marshall at 30.0% compared to 22.0% in Hazel park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marshall | Hazel park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (12) | 1.0% (152) |
| High School Diploma | 27.9% (373) | 21.1% (3,127) |
| Less than High School | 32.4% (434) | 16.1% (2,395) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (156) | 16.9% (2,511) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Hazel park
- In Hazel park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.9% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a high school diploma at 27.9% compared to 21.1% in Hazel park.
- More residents in Marshall have less than a high school education at 32.4% compared to 16.1% in Hazel park.
- In Hazel park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 11.7% in Marshall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.