Demographics details for Marshall, AR vs Elmo, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, AR vs Elmo, UT.
| Data | Marshall | Elmo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,339 | 415 |
| Median Age | 52.3 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $28,290 | $62,917 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Elmo
- In Marshall, the population is higher at 1,339, compared to 415 in Elmo.
- Residents in Marshall have a higher median age of 52.3 years compared to 38.3 years in Elmo.
- Elmo has a higher median income of $62,917, compared to $28,290 in Marshall.
- In Elmo, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 33.0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 0% in Elmo.
- The unemployment rate in Marshall is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.5% in Elmo.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Elmo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marshall | Elmo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 84 | 96 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Elmo
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Marshall and Elmo at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Elmo at 96% compared to 84% in Marshall.
- Both Marshall and Elmo have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Elmo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Marshall.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Marshall at 12% compared to 0% in Elmo.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Marshall at 1% compared to 0% in Elmo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marshall | Elmo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.7% | 17.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.2% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 29.8% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 27.2% | 11.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 13.2% |
| Obesity | 39.2% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Elmo
- More residents in Marshall report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 17.3% in Elmo.
- Depression is more prevalent in Marshall at 29.8% compared to 22.9% in Elmo.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Marshall at 27.2% compared to 11.9% in Elmo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Marshall at 14.7% compared to 13.2% in Elmo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Marshall at 39.2% compared to 36.4% in Elmo.
- Disability percentages are higher in Marshall at 30.0% compared to 20.0% in Elmo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marshall | Elmo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (12) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 27.9% (373) | 8.0% (33) |
| Less than High School | 32.4% (434) | 5.8% (24) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (156) | 13.7% (57) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Elmo
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Elmo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a high school diploma at 27.9% compared to 8.0% in Elmo.
- More residents in Marshall have less than a high school education at 32.4% compared to 5.8% in Elmo.
- In Elmo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 11.7% in Marshall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.