Demographics details for Marshall, AR vs Cameron, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, AR vs Cameron, TX.
| Data | Marshall | Cameron |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,339 | 425,208 |
| Median Age | 52.3 years | 32.0 years |
| Median Income | $28,290 | $47,435 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 6.2 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Cameron
- The population in Cameron is higher at 425,208, compared to 1,339 in Marshall.
- Residents in Marshall have a higher median age of 52.3 years compared to 32.0 years in Cameron.
- Cameron has a higher median income of $47,435, compared to $28,290 in Marshall.
- In Cameron, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 33.0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 15% in Cameron.
- Cameron has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 4.2% in Marshall.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Cameron provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marshall | Cameron |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 84 | 60 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 89 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 29 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Cameron
- In Cameron, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 60% in Cameron.
- In Cameron, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Marshall.
- Cameron has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 89%, compared to 3% in Marshall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cameron at 29%, compared to 12% in Marshall.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Marshall at 1% compared to 0% in Cameron.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marshall | Cameron |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.7% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.2% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 29.8% | 19.0% |
| Smoking | 27.2% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 39.2% | 44.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Cameron
- More residents in Marshall report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 17.0% in Cameron.
- Depression is more prevalent in Marshall at 29.8% compared to 19.0% in Cameron.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Marshall at 27.2% compared to 15.4% in Cameron.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cameron at 16.3% compared to 14.7% in Marshall.
- Cameron has higher obesity rates at 44.6% compared to 39.2% in Marshall.
- Disability percentages are higher in Marshall at 30.0% compared to 12.0% in Cameron.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marshall | Cameron |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (12) | 2.8% (11,750) |
| High School Diploma | 27.9% (373) | 12.6% (53,487) |
| Less than High School | 32.4% (434) | 34.2% (145,250) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (156) | 11.5% (48,712) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Cameron
- In Cameron, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.9% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a high school diploma at 27.9% compared to 12.6% in Cameron.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cameron at 34.2%, compared to 32.4% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 11.5% in Cameron.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.