Demographics details for Marshall, AR vs Big bear lake, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, AR vs Big bear lake, CA.
| Data | Marshall | Big bear lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,339 | 5,031 |
| Median Age | 52.3 years | 47.5 years |
| Median Income | $28,290 | $70,020 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Big bear lake
- The population in Big bear lake is higher at 5,031, compared to 1,339 in Marshall.
- Residents in Marshall have a higher median age of 52.3 years compared to 47.5 years in Big bear lake.
- Big bear lake has a higher median income of $70,020, compared to $28,290 in Marshall.
- In Big bear lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 33.0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 10% in Big bear lake.
- Big bear lake has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.2% in Marshall.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Big bear lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marshall | Big bear lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 84 | 50 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 16 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Big bear lake
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Marshall and Big bear lake at 0%.
- Marshall has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 50% in Big bear lake.
- In Big bear lake, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Marshall.
- Big bear lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 3% in Marshall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Big bear lake at 16%, compared to 12% in Marshall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Marshall and Big bear lake at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marshall | Big bear lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.7% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.2% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 29.8% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | 27.2% | 14.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 39.2% | 37.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Big bear lake
- More residents in Marshall report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 17.4% in Big bear lake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Marshall at 29.8% compared to 20.5% in Big bear lake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Marshall at 27.2% compared to 14.1% in Big bear lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Big bear lake at 17.0% compared to 14.7% in Marshall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Marshall at 39.2% compared to 37.0% in Big bear lake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Marshall at 30.0% compared to 9.0% in Big bear lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marshall | Big bear lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (12) | 0.7% (37) |
| High School Diploma | 27.9% (373) | 16.4% (825) |
| Less than High School | 32.4% (434) | 12.6% (634) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (156) | 25.7% (1,294) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Big bear lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Big bear lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a high school diploma at 27.9% compared to 16.4% in Big bear lake.
- More residents in Marshall have less than a high school education at 32.4% compared to 12.6% in Big bear lake.
- In Big bear lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.7% compared to 11.7% in Marshall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.