Demographics details for Mars, PA vs Flomaton, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mars, PA vs Flomaton, AL.
| Data | Mars | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,430 | 1,458 |
| Median Age | 58.2 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $57,700 | $37,500 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Mars vs Flomaton
- The population in Flomaton is higher at 1,458, compared to 1,430 in Mars.
- Residents in Mars have a higher median age of 58.2 years compared to 32.6 years in Flomaton.
- Mars has a higher median income of $57,700 compared to $37,500 in Flomaton.
- In Flomaton, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 23.0% in Mars.
- The poverty level is higher in Flomaton at 15%, compared to 5% in Mars.
- Flomaton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.2% in Mars.
Demographics
Demographics Mars vs Flomaton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mars | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 38 |
| White | 89 | 58 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mars vs Flomaton
- In Flomaton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 0% in Mars.
- Mars has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 58% in Flomaton.
- Both Mars and Flomaton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mars at 6% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mars at 5% compared to 4% in Flomaton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mars and Flomaton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mars | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 15.3% |
| Depression | 20.7% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 13.9% | 24.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.2% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 30.7% | 45.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mars vs Flomaton
- In Flomaton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 14.2% in Mars.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Flomaton at 24.6% versus 20.7% in Mars.
- Flomaton has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 13.9% in Mars.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mars at 20.2% compared to 13.7% in Flomaton.
- Flomaton has higher obesity rates at 45.3% compared to 30.7% in Mars.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mars at 20.0% compared to 19.0% in Flomaton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mars | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (5) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 23.1% (331) | 25.0% (364) |
| Less than High School | 7.6% (108) | 19.1% (278) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (235) | 9.4% (137) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mars vs Flomaton
- A higher percentage of residents in Mars have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Flomaton.
- In Flomaton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 23.1% in Mars.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Flomaton at 19.1%, compared to 7.6% in Mars.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mars hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 9.4% in Flomaton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.