Demographics details for Marlboro, NJ vs Spring park, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marlboro, NJ vs Spring park, MN.
| Data | Marlboro | Spring park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 41,480 | 1,663 |
| Median Age | 43.5 years | 55.5 years |
| Median Income | $170,357 | $48,684 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Marlboro vs Spring park
- In Marlboro, the population is higher at 41,480, compared to 1,663 in Spring park.
- The median age in Spring park is higher at 55.5 years, compared to 43.5 years in Marlboro.
- Marlboro has a higher median income of $170,357 compared to $48,684 in Spring park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Marlboro at 53.0% compared to 30.0% in Spring park.
- The poverty level is identical in both Marlboro and Spring park at 5%.
- Spring park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.0% in Marlboro.
Demographics
Demographics Marlboro vs Spring park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marlboro | Spring park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 9 |
| White | 67 | 82 |
| Asian | 22 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Marlboro vs Spring park
- In Spring park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 2% in Marlboro.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Spring park at 82% compared to 67% in Marlboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Marlboro at 22% compared to 2% in Spring park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Marlboro at 5% compared to 1% in Spring park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Marlboro at 4% compared to 3% in Spring park.
- In Spring park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Marlboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marlboro | Spring park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 13.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 7.1% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 11.7% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 22.5% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 26.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marlboro vs Spring park
- In Spring park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.4% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spring park at 23.7% versus 0.0% in Marlboro.
- Spring park has a higher smoking rate at 11.7% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Spring park at 22.5% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- Spring park has higher obesity rates at 26.0% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Spring park at 22.0% compared to 8.0% in Marlboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marlboro | Spring park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (336) | 0.5% (9) |
| High School Diploma | 8.6% (3,576) | 27.8% (463) |
| Less than High School | 3.2% (1,348) | 12.0% (200) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 43.0% (17,837) | 29.1% (484) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marlboro vs Spring park
- A higher percentage of residents in Marlboro have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Spring park.
- In Spring park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.8% compared to 8.6% in Marlboro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Spring park at 12.0%, compared to 3.2% in Marlboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marlboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.0% compared to 29.1% in Spring park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.