Demographics details for Marlboro, NJ vs Pratt, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marlboro, NJ vs Pratt, KS.
| Data | Marlboro | Pratt |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 41,480 | 9,067 |
| Median Age | 43.5 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $170,357 | $61,685 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Marlboro vs Pratt
- In Marlboro, the population is higher at 41,480, compared to 9,067 in Pratt.
- Residents in Marlboro have a higher median age of 43.5 years compared to 37.6 years in Pratt.
- Marlboro has a higher median income of $170,357 compared to $61,685 in Pratt.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Marlboro at 53.0% compared to 36.0% in Pratt.
- The poverty level is higher in Pratt at 12%, compared to 5% in Marlboro.
- Pratt has a higher unemployment rate at 3.1% compared to 3.0% in Marlboro.
Demographics
Demographics Marlboro vs Pratt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marlboro | Pratt |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 67 | 83 |
| Asian | 22 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Marlboro vs Pratt
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Marlboro and Pratt at 2%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pratt at 83% compared to 67% in Marlboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Marlboro at 22% compared to 0% in Pratt.
- Pratt has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 5% in Marlboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pratt at 6%, compared to 4% in Marlboro.
- In Pratt, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Marlboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marlboro | Pratt |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 9.9% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marlboro vs Pratt
- In Pratt, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pratt at 19.7% versus 0.0% in Marlboro.
- Pratt has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pratt at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- Pratt has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pratt at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Marlboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marlboro | Pratt |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (336) | 0.2% (22) |
| High School Diploma | 8.6% (3,576) | 15.0% (1,362) |
| Less than High School | 3.2% (1,348) | 10.3% (936) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 43.0% (17,837) | 18.0% (1,634) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marlboro vs Pratt
- A higher percentage of residents in Marlboro have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.2% in Pratt.
- In Pratt, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 8.6% in Marlboro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pratt at 10.3%, compared to 3.2% in Marlboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marlboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.0% compared to 18.0% in Pratt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.