Demographics details for Marlboro, NJ vs Kings mountain, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marlboro, NJ vs Kings mountain, NC.
| Data | Marlboro | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 41,480 | 11,638 |
| Median Age | 43.5 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $170,357 | $45,301 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Marlboro vs Kings mountain
- In Marlboro, the population is higher at 41,480, compared to 11,638 in Kings mountain.
- Residents in Marlboro have a higher median age of 43.5 years compared to 41.5 years in Kings mountain.
- Marlboro has a higher median income of $170,357 compared to $45,301 in Kings mountain.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Marlboro at 53.0% compared to 24.0% in Kings mountain.
- The poverty level is higher in Kings mountain at 11%, compared to 5% in Marlboro.
- Kings mountain has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.0% in Marlboro.
Demographics
Demographics Marlboro vs Kings mountain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marlboro | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 25 |
| White | 67 | 68 |
| Asian | 22 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marlboro vs Kings mountain
- In Kings mountain, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 2% in Marlboro.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kings mountain at 68% compared to 67% in Marlboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Marlboro at 22% compared to 2% in Kings mountain.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Marlboro at 5% compared to 2% in Kings mountain.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Marlboro at 4% compared to 3% in Kings mountain.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Marlboro and Kings mountain at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marlboro | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 13.1% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 20.9% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 38.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marlboro vs Kings mountain
- In Kings mountain, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kings mountain at 25.7% versus 0.0% in Marlboro.
- Kings mountain has a higher smoking rate at 20.9% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kings mountain at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- Kings mountain has higher obesity rates at 38.0% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kings mountain at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Marlboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marlboro | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (336) | 0.4% (43) |
| High School Diploma | 8.6% (3,576) | 21.7% (2,528) |
| Less than High School | 3.2% (1,348) | 17.8% (2,071) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 43.0% (17,837) | 11.6% (1,353) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marlboro vs Kings mountain
- A higher percentage of residents in Marlboro have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Kings mountain.
- In Kings mountain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 8.6% in Marlboro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kings mountain at 17.8%, compared to 3.2% in Marlboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marlboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.0% compared to 11.6% in Kings mountain.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.