Demographics details for Marlboro, NJ vs Hoover, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marlboro, NJ vs Hoover, AL.
| Data | Marlboro | Hoover |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 41,480 | 92,435 |
| Median Age | 43.5 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $170,357 | $101,765 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Marlboro vs Hoover
- The population in Hoover is higher at 92,435, compared to 41,480 in Marlboro.
- Residents in Marlboro have a higher median age of 43.5 years compared to 38.3 years in Hoover.
- Marlboro has a higher median income of $170,357 compared to $101,765 in Hoover.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Marlboro at 53.0% compared to 46.0% in Hoover.
- The poverty level is higher in Hoover at 7%, compared to 5% in Marlboro.
- The unemployment rate in Marlboro is higher at 3.0%, compared to 2.2% in Hoover.
Demographics
Demographics Marlboro vs Hoover provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marlboro | Hoover |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 20 |
| White | 67 | 67 |
| Asian | 22 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marlboro vs Hoover
- In Hoover, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 2% in Marlboro.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Marlboro and Hoover at 67%.
- The Asian population is larger in Marlboro at 22% compared to 5% in Hoover.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Marlboro and Hoover at 5%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Marlboro at 4% compared to 3% in Hoover.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Marlboro and Hoover at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marlboro | Hoover |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 8.6% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 32.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marlboro vs Hoover
- In Hoover, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hoover at 21.3% versus 0.0% in Marlboro.
- Hoover has a higher smoking rate at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hoover at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- Hoover has higher obesity rates at 32.1% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hoover at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Marlboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marlboro | Hoover |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (336) | 0.6% (583) |
| High School Diploma | 8.6% (3,576) | 7.3% (6,787) |
| Less than High School | 3.2% (1,348) | 3.8% (3,478) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 43.0% (17,837) | 41.1% (38,000) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marlboro vs Hoover
- A higher percentage of residents in Marlboro have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Hoover.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marlboro hold a high school diploma at 8.6% compared to 7.3% in Hoover.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hoover at 3.8%, compared to 3.2% in Marlboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marlboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.0% compared to 41.1% in Hoover.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.