Demographics details for Marlboro, NJ vs Fort lupton, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Marlboro, NJ vs Fort lupton, CO.

Data Marlboro Fort lupton
Population 41,480 8,829
Median Age 43.5 years 35.9 years
Median Income $170,357 $71,293
Married Families 53.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 5% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 3.5

Population Comparison: Marlboro vs Fort lupton

  • In Marlboro, the population is higher at 41,480, compared to 8,829 in Fort lupton.
  • Residents in Marlboro have a higher median age of 43.5 years compared to 35.9 years in Fort lupton.
  • Marlboro has a higher median income of $170,357 compared to $71,293 in Fort lupton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Marlboro at 53.0% compared to 34.0% in Fort lupton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fort lupton at 10%, compared to 5% in Marlboro.
  • Fort lupton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.0% in Marlboro.

Demographics

Demographics Marlboro vs Fort lupton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Marlboro Fort lupton
Black 2 Data is updating
White 67 26
Asian 22 Data is updating
Hispanic 5 53
Two or More Races 4 20
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Marlboro vs Fort lupton

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Marlboro at 2% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
  • Marlboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
  • The Asian population is larger in Marlboro at 22% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
  • Fort lupton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 53%, compared to 5% in Marlboro.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort lupton at 20%, compared to 4% in Marlboro.
  • In Fort lupton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Marlboro.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Marlboro Fort lupton
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.8%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 11.8%
Depression Data is updating% 19.9%
Smoking Data is updating% 15.0%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 17.0%
Obesity Data is updating% 30.2%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Marlboro vs Fort lupton

  • In Fort lupton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fort lupton at 19.9% versus 0.0% in Marlboro.
  • Fort lupton has a higher smoking rate at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort lupton at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
  • Fort lupton has higher obesity rates at 30.2% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort lupton at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Marlboro.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Marlboro Fort lupton
No Schooling 0.8% (336) 1.6% (145)
High School Diploma 8.6% (3,576) 16.2% (1,428)
Less than High School 3.2% (1,348) 28.0% (2,476)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 43.0% (17,837) 7.0% (622)

Education Levels Comparison: Marlboro vs Fort lupton

  • In Fort lupton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.8% in Marlboro.
  • In Fort lupton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.2% compared to 8.6% in Marlboro.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort lupton at 28.0%, compared to 3.2% in Marlboro.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Marlboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.0% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.