Demographics details for Marlboro, NJ vs Forest lake, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Marlboro, NJ vs Forest lake, MN.

Data Marlboro Forest lake
Population 41,480 20,857
Median Age 43.5 years 37.9 years
Median Income $170,357 $91,157
Married Families 53.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 5% 6%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 3.2

Population Comparison: Marlboro vs Forest lake

  • In Marlboro, the population is higher at 41,480, compared to 20,857 in Forest lake.
  • Residents in Marlboro have a higher median age of 43.5 years compared to 37.9 years in Forest lake.
  • Marlboro has a higher median income of $170,357 compared to $91,157 in Forest lake.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Marlboro at 53.0% compared to 42.0% in Forest lake.
  • The poverty level is higher in Forest lake at 6%, compared to 5% in Marlboro.
  • Forest lake has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.0% in Marlboro.

Demographics

Demographics Marlboro vs Forest lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Marlboro Forest lake
Black 2 3
White 67 81
Asian 22 4
Hispanic 5 6
Two or More Races 4 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Marlboro vs Forest lake

  • In Forest lake, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Marlboro.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Forest lake at 81% compared to 67% in Marlboro.
  • The Asian population is larger in Marlboro at 22% compared to 4% in Forest lake.
  • Forest lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Marlboro.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Forest lake at 6%, compared to 4% in Marlboro.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Marlboro and Forest lake at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Marlboro Forest lake
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 14.7%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 8.8%
Depression Data is updating% 24.1%
Smoking Data is updating% 15.7%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 21.4%
Obesity Data is updating% 32.9%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Marlboro vs Forest lake

  • In Forest lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Forest lake at 24.1% versus 0.0% in Marlboro.
  • Forest lake has a higher smoking rate at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Forest lake at 21.4% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
  • Forest lake has higher obesity rates at 32.9% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Forest lake at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Marlboro.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Marlboro Forest lake
No Schooling 0.8% (336) 0.5% (101)
High School Diploma 8.6% (3,576) 14.6% (3,055)
Less than High School 3.2% (1,348) 7.7% (1,615)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 43.0% (17,837) 24.6% (5,123)

Education Levels Comparison: Marlboro vs Forest lake

  • A higher percentage of residents in Marlboro have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Forest lake.
  • In Forest lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.6% compared to 8.6% in Marlboro.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Forest lake at 7.7%, compared to 3.2% in Marlboro.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Marlboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.0% compared to 24.6% in Forest lake.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.