Demographics details for Marlboro, NJ vs Camden, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marlboro, NJ vs Camden, AR.
| Data | Marlboro | Camden |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 41,480 | 10,298 |
| Median Age | 43.5 years | 38.7 years |
| Median Income | $170,357 | $48,302 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Marlboro vs Camden
- In Marlboro, the population is higher at 41,480, compared to 10,298 in Camden.
- Residents in Marlboro have a higher median age of 43.5 years compared to 38.7 years in Camden.
- Marlboro has a higher median income of $170,357 compared to $48,302 in Camden.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Marlboro at 53.0% compared to 29.0% in Camden.
- The poverty level is higher in Camden at 19%, compared to 5% in Marlboro.
- Camden has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.0% in Marlboro.
Demographics
Demographics Marlboro vs Camden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marlboro | Camden |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 52 |
| White | 67 | 44 |
| Asian | 22 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marlboro vs Camden
- In Camden, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 2% in Marlboro.
- Marlboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 44% in Camden.
- The Asian population is larger in Marlboro at 22% compared to 0% in Camden.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Marlboro at 5% compared to 2% in Camden.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Marlboro at 4% compared to 2% in Camden.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Marlboro and Camden at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marlboro | Camden |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 21.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 17.0% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 27.3% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 11.9% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 43.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marlboro vs Camden
- In Camden, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Camden at 24.4% versus 0.0% in Marlboro.
- Camden has a higher smoking rate at 27.3% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Camden at 11.9% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- Camden has higher obesity rates at 43.6% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Camden at 27.0% compared to 8.0% in Marlboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marlboro | Camden |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (336) | 0.3% (28) |
| High School Diploma | 8.6% (3,576) | 20.5% (2,109) |
| Less than High School | 3.2% (1,348) | 14.1% (1,455) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 43.0% (17,837) | 11.2% (1,152) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marlboro vs Camden
- A higher percentage of residents in Marlboro have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in Camden.
- In Camden, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.5% compared to 8.6% in Marlboro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Camden at 14.1%, compared to 3.2% in Marlboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marlboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.0% compared to 11.2% in Camden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.