Demographics details for Markleeville, CA vs Torrington, CT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Markleeville, CA vs Torrington, CT.

Data Markleeville Torrington
Population 163 35,563
Median Age 64.6 years 40.8 years
Median Income $93,333 $66,616
Married Families 63.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 2.8

Population Comparison: Markleeville vs Torrington

  • The population in Torrington is higher at 35,563, compared to 163 in Markleeville.
  • Residents in Markleeville have a higher median age of 64.6 years compared to 40.8 years in Torrington.
  • Markleeville has a higher median income of $93,333 compared to $66,616 in Torrington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Markleeville at 63.0% compared to 35.0% in Torrington.
  • The poverty level is higher in Torrington at 9%, compared to 0% in Markleeville.
  • The unemployment rate in Markleeville is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.8% in Torrington.

Demographics

Demographics Markleeville vs Torrington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Markleeville Torrington
Black Data is updating 10
White 77 61
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 23 17
Two or More Races Data is updating 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Markleeville vs Torrington

  • In Torrington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
  • Markleeville has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 61% in Torrington.
  • In Torrington, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Markleeville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Markleeville at 23% compared to 17% in Torrington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Torrington at 9%, compared to 0% in Markleeville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Markleeville and Torrington at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Markleeville Torrington
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% 16.2%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 10.5%
Depression 23.0% 23.3%
Smoking 15.4% 16.0%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 16.6%
Obesity 30.0% 28.8%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Markleeville vs Torrington

  • More residents in Markleeville report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.2% in Torrington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Torrington at 23.3% versus 23.0% in Markleeville.
  • Torrington has a higher smoking rate at 16.0% compared to 15.4% in Markleeville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Markleeville at 17.1% compared to 16.6% in Torrington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Markleeville at 30.0% compared to 28.8% in Torrington.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Markleeville at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Torrington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Markleeville Torrington
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.2% (425)
High School Diploma 19.6% (32) 22.6% (8,040)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 16.1% (5,736)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 35.6% (58) 17.7% (6,279)

Education Levels Comparison: Markleeville vs Torrington

  • In Torrington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
  • In Torrington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 19.6% in Markleeville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Torrington at 16.1%, compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Markleeville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.6% compared to 17.7% in Torrington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.