Demographics details for Markleeville, CA vs Little rock, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Markleeville, CA vs Little rock, AR.
Data | Markleeville | Little rock |
---|---|---|
Population | 163 | 202,864 |
Median Age | 64.6 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $93,333 | $58,697 |
Married Families | 63.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Markleeville vs Little rock
- The population in Little rock is higher at 202,864, compared to 163 in Markleeville.
- Residents in Markleeville have a higher median age of 64.6 years compared to 36.6 years in Little rock.
- Markleeville has a higher median income of $93,333 compared to $58,697 in Little rock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Markleeville at 63.0% compared to 32.0% in Little rock.
- The poverty level is higher in Little rock at 14%, compared to 0% in Markleeville.
- The unemployment rate in Markleeville is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.7% in Little rock.
Demographics
Demographics Markleeville vs Little rock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Markleeville | Little rock |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 41 |
White | 77 | 44 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 23 | 8 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Markleeville vs Little rock
- In Little rock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
- Markleeville has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 44% in Little rock.
- In Little rock, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Markleeville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Markleeville at 23% compared to 8% in Little rock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Little rock at 4%, compared to 0% in Markleeville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Markleeville and Little rock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Markleeville | Little rock |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Depression | 23.0% | 21.9% |
Smoking | 15.4% | 19.0% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 12.9% |
Obesity | 30.0% | 39.0% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Markleeville vs Little rock
- More residents in Markleeville report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.9% in Little rock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Markleeville at 23.0% compared to 21.9% in Little rock.
- Little rock has a higher smoking rate at 19.0% compared to 15.4% in Markleeville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Markleeville at 17.1% compared to 12.9% in Little rock.
- Little rock has higher obesity rates at 39.0% compared to 30.0% in Markleeville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Markleeville at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Little rock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Markleeville | Little rock |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (1,359) |
High School Diploma | 19.6% (32) | 12.2% (24,667) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 7.3% (14,766) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.6% (58) | 29.4% (59,641) |
Education Levels Comparison: Markleeville vs Little rock
- In Little rock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Markleeville hold a high school diploma at 19.6% compared to 12.2% in Little rock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Little rock at 7.3%, compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Markleeville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.6% compared to 29.4% in Little rock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.