Demographics details for Markleeville, CA vs Flint hill, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Markleeville, CA vs Flint hill, VA.

Data Markleeville Flint hill
Population 163 319
Median Age 64.6 years 28.0 years
Median Income $93,333 $39,044
Married Families 63.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 4%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Markleeville vs Flint hill

  • The population in Flint hill is higher at 319, compared to 163 in Markleeville.
  • Residents in Markleeville have a higher median age of 64.6 years compared to 28.0 years in Flint hill.
  • Markleeville has a higher median income of $93,333 compared to $39,044 in Flint hill.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Markleeville at 63.0% compared to 47.0% in Flint hill.
  • The poverty level is higher in Flint hill at 4%, compared to 0% in Markleeville.
  • The unemployment rate in Markleeville is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Flint hill.

Demographics

Demographics Markleeville vs Flint hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Markleeville Flint hill
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 77 67
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 23 26
Two or More Races Data is updating 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Markleeville vs Flint hill

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Markleeville and Flint hill at 0%.
  • Markleeville has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 67% in Flint hill.
  • Both Markleeville and Flint hill have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Flint hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 23% in Markleeville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Flint hill at 7%, compared to 0% in Markleeville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Markleeville and Flint hill at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Markleeville Flint hill
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% 16.5%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 10.4%
Depression 23.0% 24.0%
Smoking 15.4% 16.0%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 18.5%
Obesity 30.0% 34.4%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Markleeville vs Flint hill

  • More residents in Markleeville report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.5% in Flint hill.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Flint hill at 24.0% versus 23.0% in Markleeville.
  • Flint hill has a higher smoking rate at 16.0% compared to 15.4% in Markleeville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Flint hill at 18.5% compared to 17.1% in Markleeville.
  • Flint hill has higher obesity rates at 34.4% compared to 30.0% in Markleeville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Markleeville at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Flint hill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Markleeville Flint hill
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 19.6% (32) 20.1% (64)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 28.2% (90)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 35.6% (58) 15.7% (50)

Education Levels Comparison: Markleeville vs Flint hill

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Markleeville and Flint hill at 0.0%.
  • In Flint hill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.1% compared to 19.6% in Markleeville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Flint hill at 28.2%, compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Markleeville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.6% compared to 15.7% in Flint hill.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.