Demographics details for Markleeville, CA vs Crawford, NE

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Markleeville, CA vs Crawford, NE.

Data Markleeville Crawford
Population 163 838
Median Age 64.6 years 52.1 years
Median Income $93,333 $54,167
Married Families 63.0% 60.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Markleeville vs Crawford

  • The population in Crawford is higher at 838, compared to 163 in Markleeville.
  • Residents in Markleeville have a higher median age of 64.6 years compared to 52.1 years in Crawford.
  • Markleeville has a higher median income of $93,333 compared to $54,167 in Crawford.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Markleeville at 63.0% compared to 60.0% in Crawford.
  • The poverty level is higher in Crawford at 10%, compared to 0% in Markleeville.
  • The unemployment rate in Markleeville is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Crawford.

Demographics

Demographics Markleeville vs Crawford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Markleeville Crawford
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 77 76
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 23 15
Two or More Races Data is updating 3
American Indian Data is updating 6

Demographics Comparison: Markleeville vs Crawford

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Markleeville and Crawford at 0%.
  • Markleeville has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 76% in Crawford.
  • Both Markleeville and Crawford have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Markleeville at 23% compared to 15% in Crawford.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Crawford at 3%, compared to 0% in Markleeville.
  • In Crawford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 0% in Markleeville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Markleeville Crawford
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% 13.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 9.4%
Depression 23.0% 18.9%
Smoking 15.4% 15.7%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 20.0%
Obesity 30.0% 40.3%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Markleeville vs Crawford

  • More residents in Markleeville report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 13.8% in Crawford.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Markleeville at 23.0% compared to 18.9% in Crawford.
  • Crawford has a higher smoking rate at 15.7% compared to 15.4% in Markleeville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Crawford at 20.0% compared to 17.1% in Markleeville.
  • Crawford has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 30.0% in Markleeville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Markleeville at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Crawford.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Markleeville Crawford
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.6% (5)
High School Diploma 19.6% (32) 30.2% (253)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 6.0% (50)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 35.6% (58) 17.1% (143)

Education Levels Comparison: Markleeville vs Crawford

  • In Crawford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
  • In Crawford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.2% compared to 19.6% in Markleeville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crawford at 6.0%, compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Markleeville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.6% compared to 17.1% in Crawford.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.