Demographics details for Markleeville, CA vs Clearfield, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Markleeville, CA vs Clearfield, UT.

Data Markleeville Clearfield
Population 163 34,062
Median Age 64.6 years 29.8 years
Median Income $93,333 $69,889
Married Families 63.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 4.3

Population Comparison: Markleeville vs Clearfield

  • The population in Clearfield is higher at 34,062, compared to 163 in Markleeville.
  • Residents in Markleeville have a higher median age of 64.6 years compared to 29.8 years in Clearfield.
  • Markleeville has a higher median income of $93,333 compared to $69,889 in Clearfield.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Markleeville at 63.0% compared to 37.0% in Clearfield.
  • The poverty level is higher in Clearfield at 10%, compared to 0% in Markleeville.
  • Clearfield has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 4.2% in Markleeville.

Demographics

Demographics Markleeville vs Clearfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Markleeville Clearfield
Black Data is updating 3
White 77 69
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 23 17
Two or More Races Data is updating 8
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Markleeville vs Clearfield

  • In Clearfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
  • Markleeville has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 69% in Clearfield.
  • In Clearfield, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Markleeville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Markleeville at 23% compared to 17% in Clearfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clearfield at 8%, compared to 0% in Markleeville.
  • In Clearfield, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Markleeville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Markleeville Clearfield
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% 17.4%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 11.7%
Depression 23.0% 24.6%
Smoking 15.4% 10.2%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 10.2%
Obesity 30.0% 36.3%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Markleeville vs Clearfield

  • More residents in Markleeville report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.4% in Clearfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Clearfield at 24.6% versus 23.0% in Markleeville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Markleeville at 15.4% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Markleeville at 17.1% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
  • Clearfield has higher obesity rates at 36.3% compared to 30.0% in Markleeville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Markleeville at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Clearfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Markleeville Clearfield
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.6% (208)
High School Diploma 19.6% (32) 13.8% (4,690)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 10.7% (3,633)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 35.6% (58) 12.8% (4,366)

Education Levels Comparison: Markleeville vs Clearfield

  • In Clearfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Markleeville hold a high school diploma at 19.6% compared to 13.8% in Clearfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clearfield at 10.7%, compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Markleeville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.6% compared to 12.8% in Clearfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.