Demographics details for Markleeville, CA vs Cicero, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Markleeville, CA vs Cicero, IL.
| Data | Markleeville | Cicero |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163 | 81,919 |
| Median Age | 64.6 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $93,333 | $64,325 |
| Married Families | 63.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 6.4 |
Population Comparison: Markleeville vs Cicero
- The population in Cicero is higher at 81,919, compared to 163 in Markleeville.
- Residents in Markleeville have a higher median age of 64.6 years compared to 33.4 years in Cicero.
- Markleeville has a higher median income of $93,333 compared to $64,325 in Cicero.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Markleeville at 63.0% compared to 32.0% in Cicero.
- The poverty level is higher in Cicero at 14%, compared to 0% in Markleeville.
- Cicero has a higher unemployment rate at 6.4% compared to 4.2% in Markleeville.
Demographics
Demographics Markleeville vs Cicero provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Markleeville | Cicero |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 77 | -10 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 90 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Markleeville vs Cicero
- In Cicero, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
- Markleeville has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to -10% in Cicero.
- In Cicero, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Markleeville.
- Cicero has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 90%, compared to 23% in Markleeville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cicero at 14%, compared to 0% in Markleeville.
- In Cicero, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Markleeville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Markleeville | Cicero |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 15.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 23.0% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 15.4% | 16.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 30.0% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Markleeville vs Cicero
- More residents in Markleeville report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.3% in Cicero.
- Depression is more prevalent in Markleeville at 23.0% compared to 16.8% in Cicero.
- Cicero has a higher smoking rate at 16.5% compared to 15.4% in Markleeville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Markleeville at 17.1% compared to 16.2% in Cicero.
- Cicero has higher obesity rates at 36.8% compared to 30.0% in Markleeville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Markleeville at 17.0% compared to 6.0% in Cicero.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Markleeville | Cicero |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.2% (2,662) |
| High School Diploma | 19.6% (32) | 19.6% (16,037) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 38.2% (31,314) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.6% (58) | 7.1% (5,829) |
Education Levels Comparison: Markleeville vs Cicero
- In Cicero, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 19.6%.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cicero at 38.2%, compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Markleeville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.6% compared to 7.1% in Cicero.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.