Demographics details for Marietta, GA vs Chickasha, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marietta, GA vs Chickasha, OK.
| Data | Marietta | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 62,602 | 16,549 |
| Median Age | 35.2 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $67,589 | $55,136 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Marietta vs Chickasha
- In Marietta, the population is higher at 62,602, compared to 16,549 in Chickasha.
- The median age in Chickasha is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 35.2 years in Marietta.
- Marietta has a higher median income of $67,589 compared to $55,136 in Chickasha.
- In Chickasha, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 31.0% in Marietta.
- The poverty level is higher in Chickasha at 17%, compared to 11% in Marietta.
- The unemployment rate in Marietta is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Marietta vs Chickasha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marietta | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 30 | 6 |
| White | 41 | 71 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 18 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Marietta vs Chickasha
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Marietta at 30% compared to 6% in Chickasha.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chickasha at 71% compared to 41% in Marietta.
- The Asian population is larger in Marietta at 2% compared to 0% in Chickasha.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Marietta at 18% compared to 8% in Chickasha.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chickasha at 11%, compared to 8% in Marietta.
- In Chickasha, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 1% in Marietta.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marietta | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 18.1% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 14.5% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 32.3% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marietta vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.1% in Marietta.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chickasha at 25.4% versus 18.1% in Marietta.
- Chickasha has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 14.5% in Marietta.
- Binge drinking is more common in Marietta at 14.5% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 32.3% in Marietta.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Marietta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marietta | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (1,148) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 10.0% (6,250) | 22.5% (3,730) |
| Less than High School | 13.1% (8,224) | 13.1% (2,160) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.9% (18,706) | 12.5% (2,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marietta vs Chickasha
- A higher percentage of residents in Marietta have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.5% in Chickasha.
- In Chickasha, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.5% compared to 10.0% in Marietta.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 13.1%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marietta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.9% compared to 12.5% in Chickasha.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.