Demographics details for Maricopa, AZ vs San mateo, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Maricopa, AZ vs San mateo, CA.
Data | Maricopa | San mateo |
---|---|---|
Population | 66,290 | 100,984 |
Median Age | 35.7 years | 38.1 years |
Median Income | $88,795 | $149,152 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Maricopa vs San mateo
- The population in San mateo is higher at 100,984, compared to 66,290 in Maricopa.
- The median age in San mateo is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 35.7 years in Maricopa.
- San mateo has a higher median income of $149,152, compared to $88,795 in Maricopa.
- In San mateo, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 38.0% in Maricopa.
- Maricopa has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in San mateo.
- The unemployment rate in Maricopa is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.4% in San mateo.
Demographics
Demographics Maricopa vs San mateo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Maricopa | San mateo |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 2 |
White | 42 | 32 |
Asian | 2 | 28 |
Hispanic | 29 | 25 |
Two or More Races | 14 | 12 |
American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Maricopa vs San mateo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Maricopa at 11% compared to 2% in San mateo.
- Maricopa has a higher percentage of White residents at 42% compared to 32% in San mateo.
- In San mateo, the Asian population stands at 28%, greater than 2% in Maricopa.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Maricopa at 29% compared to 25% in San mateo.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Maricopa at 14% compared to 12% in San mateo.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Maricopa at 2% compared to 1% in San mateo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Maricopa | San mateo |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 13.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 8.4% |
Depression | 18.6% | 15.5% |
Smoking | 15.6% | 8.7% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 35.4% | 22.8% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Maricopa vs San mateo
- More residents in Maricopa report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 13.1% in San mateo.
- Depression is more prevalent in Maricopa at 18.6% compared to 15.5% in San mateo.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Maricopa at 15.6% compared to 8.7% in San mateo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Maricopa at 18.4% compared to 16.2% in San mateo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Maricopa at 35.4% compared to 22.8% in San mateo.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Maricopa and San mateo at 9.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Maricopa | San mateo |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (254) | 1.8% (1,834) |
High School Diploma | 15.3% (10,156) | 8.2% (8,262) |
Less than High School | 8.2% (5,413) | 11.5% (11,608) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (8,850) | 44.1% (44,508) |
Education Levels Comparison: Maricopa vs San mateo
- In San mateo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.4% in Maricopa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Maricopa hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 8.2% in San mateo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San mateo at 11.5%, compared to 8.2% in Maricopa.
- In San mateo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.1% compared to 13.4% in Maricopa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.