Demographics details for Maricopa, AZ vs Lansing, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Maricopa, AZ vs Lansing, MI.
Data | Maricopa | Lansing |
---|---|---|
Population | 66,290 | 112,537 |
Median Age | 35.7 years | 32.9 years |
Median Income | $88,795 | $50,747 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 7.4 |
Population Comparison: Maricopa vs Lansing
- The population in Lansing is higher at 112,537, compared to 66,290 in Maricopa.
- Residents in Maricopa have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 32.9 years in Lansing.
- Maricopa has a higher median income of $88,795 compared to $50,747 in Lansing.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Maricopa at 38.0% compared to 28.0% in Lansing.
- The poverty level is higher in Lansing at 19%, compared to 10% in Maricopa.
- Lansing has a higher unemployment rate at 7.4% compared to 4.0% in Maricopa.
Demographics
Demographics Maricopa vs Lansing provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Maricopa | Lansing |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 24 |
White | 42 | 48 |
Asian | 2 | 5 |
Hispanic | 29 | 13 |
Two or More Races | 14 | 10 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Maricopa vs Lansing
- In Lansing, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 24% compared to 11% in Maricopa.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lansing at 48% compared to 42% in Maricopa.
- In Lansing, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Maricopa.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Maricopa at 29% compared to 13% in Lansing.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Maricopa at 14% compared to 10% in Lansing.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Maricopa at 2% compared to 0% in Lansing.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Maricopa | Lansing |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 12.9% |
Depression | 18.6% | 26.3% |
Smoking | 15.6% | 19.6% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 16.0% |
Obesity | 35.4% | 40.7% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Maricopa vs Lansing
- In Lansing, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.6% in Maricopa.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lansing at 26.3% versus 18.6% in Maricopa.
- Lansing has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 15.6% in Maricopa.
- Binge drinking is more common in Maricopa at 18.4% compared to 16.0% in Lansing.
- Lansing has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 35.4% in Maricopa.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lansing at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Maricopa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Maricopa | Lansing |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (254) | 1.3% (1,419) |
High School Diploma | 15.3% (10,156) | 13.5% (15,216) |
Less than High School | 8.2% (5,413) | 10.0% (11,269) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (8,850) | 19.3% (21,667) |
Education Levels Comparison: Maricopa vs Lansing
- In Lansing, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.4% in Maricopa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Maricopa hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 13.5% in Lansing.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lansing at 10.0%, compared to 8.2% in Maricopa.
- In Lansing, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 13.4% in Maricopa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.