Demographics details for Maricopa, AZ vs Cedar lake, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Maricopa, AZ vs Cedar lake, IN.
| Data | Maricopa | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 66,290 | 15,592 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $88,795 | $84,444 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Maricopa vs Cedar lake
- In Maricopa, the population is higher at 66,290, compared to 15,592 in Cedar lake.
- The median age in Cedar lake is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 35.7 years in Maricopa.
- Maricopa has a higher median income of $88,795 compared to $84,444 in Cedar lake.
- In Cedar lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 38.0% in Maricopa.
- Maricopa has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Cedar lake.
- The unemployment rate in Maricopa is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Cedar lake.
Demographics
Demographics Maricopa vs Cedar lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Maricopa | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | Data is updating |
| White | 42 | 94 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 29 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 3 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Maricopa vs Cedar lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Maricopa at 11% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar lake at 94% compared to 42% in Maricopa.
- The Asian population is larger in Maricopa at 2% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Maricopa at 29% compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Maricopa at 14% compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Maricopa at 2% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Maricopa | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 18.6% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | 18.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 35.4% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Maricopa vs Cedar lake
- In Cedar lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.6% in Maricopa.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar lake at 25.4% versus 18.6% in Maricopa.
- Cedar lake has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 15.6% in Maricopa.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar lake at 19.8% compared to 18.4% in Maricopa.
- Cedar lake has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 35.4% in Maricopa.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cedar lake at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Maricopa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Maricopa | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (254) | 0.4% (67) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (10,156) | 21.1% (3,292) |
| Less than High School | 8.2% (5,413) | 7.1% (1,102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (8,850) | 14.1% (2,204) |
Education Levels Comparison: Maricopa vs Cedar lake
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Maricopa and Cedar lake at 0.4%.
- In Cedar lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.1% compared to 15.3% in Maricopa.
- More residents in Maricopa have less than a high school education at 8.2% compared to 7.1% in Cedar lake.
- In Cedar lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 13.4% in Maricopa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.