Demographics details for Margate, FL vs Onalaska, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Margate, FL vs Onalaska, TX.
| Data | Margate | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,209 | 3,205 |
| Median Age | 46.8 years | 45.2 years |
| Median Income | $56,324 | $56,168 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Margate vs Onalaska
- In Margate, the population is higher at 58,209, compared to 3,205 in Onalaska.
- Residents in Margate have a higher median age of 46.8 years compared to 45.2 years in Onalaska.
- Margate has a higher median income of $56,324 compared to $56,168 in Onalaska.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Margate at 41.0% compared to 35.0% in Onalaska.
- The poverty level is higher in Onalaska at 12%, compared to 11% in Margate.
- Onalaska has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.6% in Margate.
Demographics
Demographics Margate vs Onalaska provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Margate | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | 1 |
| White | 23 | 91 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 25 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Margate vs Onalaska
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Margate at 34% compared to 1% in Onalaska.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Onalaska at 91% compared to 23% in Margate.
- The Asian population is larger in Margate at 4% compared to 0% in Onalaska.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Margate at 25% compared to 3% in Onalaska.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Margate at 14% compared to 5% in Onalaska.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Margate and Onalaska at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Margate | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 18.9% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 30.3% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Margate vs Onalaska
- In Onalaska, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.3% in Margate.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Onalaska at 26.0% versus 17.8% in Margate.
- Onalaska has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 18.9% in Margate.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Onalaska at 19.4% compared to 14.6% in Margate.
- Onalaska has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 30.3% in Margate.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Onalaska at 24.0% compared to 14.0% in Margate.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Margate | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (879) | 0.7% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 21.9% (12,751) | 15.3% (491) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (8,107) | 21.5% (689) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.7% (11,493) | 5.0% (161) |
Education Levels Comparison: Margate vs Onalaska
- A higher percentage of residents in Margate have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.7% in Onalaska.
- A higher percentage of residents in Margate hold a high school diploma at 21.9% compared to 15.3% in Onalaska.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Onalaska at 21.5%, compared to 13.9% in Margate.
- A higher percentage of residents in Margate hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.7% compared to 5.0% in Onalaska.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.