Demographics details for Margate, FL vs Hanford, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Margate, FL vs Hanford, CA.
| Data | Margate | Hanford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,209 | 58,470 |
| Median Age | 46.8 years | 32.7 years |
| Median Income | $56,324 | $73,819 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 7.0 |
Population Comparison: Margate vs Hanford
- The population in Hanford is higher at 58,470, compared to 58,209 in Margate.
- Residents in Margate have a higher median age of 46.8 years compared to 32.7 years in Hanford.
- Hanford has a higher median income of $73,819, compared to $56,324 in Margate.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Margate at 41.0% compared to 36.0% in Hanford.
- The poverty level is higher in Hanford at 13%, compared to 11% in Margate.
- Hanford has a higher unemployment rate at 7.0% compared to 3.6% in Margate.
Demographics
Demographics Margate vs Hanford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Margate | Hanford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | 7 |
| White | 23 | 23 |
| Asian | 4 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 50 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Margate vs Hanford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Margate at 34% compared to 7% in Hanford.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Margate and Hanford at 23%.
- Both Margate and Hanford have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- Hanford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 50%, compared to 25% in Margate.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hanford at 15%, compared to 14% in Margate.
- In Hanford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Margate.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Margate | Hanford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 19.4% |
| Smoking | 18.9% | 14.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 30.3% | 33.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Margate vs Hanford
- In Hanford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 16.3% in Margate.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hanford at 19.4% versus 17.8% in Margate.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Margate at 18.9% compared to 14.0% in Hanford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hanford at 16.4% compared to 14.6% in Margate.
- Hanford has higher obesity rates at 33.3% compared to 30.3% in Margate.
- Disability percentages are higher in Margate at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Hanford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Margate | Hanford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (879) | 1.7% (991) |
| High School Diploma | 21.9% (12,751) | 14.0% (8,215) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (8,107) | 21.2% (12,424) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.7% (11,493) | 11.6% (6,806) |
Education Levels Comparison: Margate vs Hanford
- In Hanford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.5% in Margate.
- A higher percentage of residents in Margate hold a high school diploma at 21.9% compared to 14.0% in Hanford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hanford at 21.2%, compared to 13.9% in Margate.
- A higher percentage of residents in Margate hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.7% compared to 11.6% in Hanford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.