Demographics details for Marble, MN vs Sikeston, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Marble, MN vs Sikeston, MO.

Data Marble Sikeston
Population 611 16,073
Median Age 33.6 years 37.3 years
Median Income $51,094 $47,464
Married Families 31.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 10% 16%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 3.4

Population Comparison: Marble vs Sikeston

  • The population in Sikeston is higher at 16,073, compared to 611 in Marble.
  • The median age in Sikeston is higher at 37.3 years, compared to 33.6 years in Marble.
  • Marble has a higher median income of $51,094 compared to $47,464 in Sikeston.
  • In Sikeston, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 31.0% in Marble.
  • The poverty level is higher in Sikeston at 16%, compared to 10% in Marble.
  • The unemployment rate in Marble is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.4% in Sikeston.

Demographics

Demographics Marble vs Sikeston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Marble Sikeston
Black 2 25
White 90 65
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 3
Two or More Races 4 7
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Marble vs Sikeston

  • In Sikeston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 2% in Marble.
  • Marble has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 65% in Sikeston.
  • The Asian population is larger in Marble at 2% compared to 0% in Sikeston.
  • Sikeston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Marble.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sikeston at 7%, compared to 4% in Marble.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Marble at 2% compared to 0% in Sikeston.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Marble Sikeston
Mental Health Not Good 15.7% 19.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.2% 14.7%
Depression 23.9% 24.6%
Smoking 21.1% 23.9%
Binge Drinking 18.8% 15.8%
Obesity 41.3% 39.0%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Marble vs Sikeston

  • In Sikeston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 15.7% in Marble.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sikeston at 24.6% versus 23.9% in Marble.
  • Sikeston has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 21.1% in Marble.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Marble at 18.8% compared to 15.8% in Sikeston.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Marble at 41.3% compared to 39.0% in Sikeston.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sikeston at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Marble.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Marble Sikeston
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.5% (76)
High School Diploma 29.3% (179) 23.0% (3,696)
Less than High School 5.6% (34) 13.3% (2,142)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 3.4% (21) 16.3% (2,619)

Education Levels Comparison: Marble vs Sikeston

  • In Sikeston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Marble.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Marble hold a high school diploma at 29.3% compared to 23.0% in Sikeston.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sikeston at 13.3%, compared to 5.6% in Marble.
  • In Sikeston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 3.4% in Marble.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.