Demographics details for Marathon, IA vs Massapequa park, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marathon, IA vs Massapequa park, NY.
Data | Marathon | Massapequa park |
---|---|---|
Population | 223 | 16,873 |
Median Age | 46.5 years | 43.7 years |
Median Income | $38,750 | $161,193 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 52.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Marathon vs Massapequa park
- The population in Massapequa park is higher at 16,873, compared to 223 in Marathon.
- Residents in Marathon have a higher median age of 46.5 years compared to 43.7 years in Massapequa park.
- Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193, compared to $38,750 in Marathon.
- In Massapequa park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 42.0% in Marathon.
- Marathon has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
- Massapequa park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.0% in Marathon.
Demographics
Demographics Marathon vs Massapequa park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Marathon | Massapequa park |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 86 | 88 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 6 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marathon vs Massapequa park
- In Massapequa park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Marathon.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Massapequa park at 88% compared to 86% in Marathon.
- In Massapequa park, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Marathon.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Marathon at 6% compared to 5% in Massapequa park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Marathon at 8% compared to 4% in Massapequa park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Marathon and Massapequa park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Marathon | Massapequa park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 13.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 8.0% |
Depression | 16.0% | 17.9% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 11.5% |
Binge Drinking | 21.5% | 19.2% |
Obesity | 33.9% | 26.4% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marathon vs Massapequa park
- More residents in Marathon report poor mental health at 14.5% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Massapequa park at 17.9% versus 16.0% in Marathon.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Marathon at 17.3% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Marathon at 21.5% compared to 19.2% in Massapequa park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Marathon at 33.9% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Marathon at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Marathon | Massapequa park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (3) | 0.3% (45) |
High School Diploma | 23.8% (53) | 15.3% (2,586) |
Less than High School | 13.9% (31) | 3.8% (641) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.0% (20) | 36.6% (6,183) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marathon vs Massapequa park
- A higher percentage of residents in Marathon have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marathon hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 15.3% in Massapequa park.
- More residents in Marathon have less than a high school education at 13.9% compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
- In Massapequa park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 9.0% in Marathon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.