Demographics details for Marana, AZ vs Cedar park, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marana, AZ vs Cedar park, TX.
| Data | Marana | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 55,962 | 77,642 |
| Median Age | 41.4 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $105,624 | $118,903 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Marana vs Cedar park
- The population in Cedar park is higher at 77,642, compared to 55,962 in Marana.
- Residents in Marana have a higher median age of 41.4 years compared to 37.6 years in Cedar park.
- Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903, compared to $105,624 in Marana.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Marana at 48.0% compared to 45.0% in Cedar park.
- Marana has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 5% in Cedar park.
- Cedar park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.2% in Marana.
Demographics
Demographics Marana vs Cedar park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marana | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 3 |
| White | 51 | 55 |
| Asian | 4 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marana vs Cedar park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Marana at 4% compared to 3% in Cedar park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar park at 55% compared to 51% in Marana.
- In Cedar park, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 4% in Marana.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Marana at 27% compared to 20% in Cedar park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Marana at 13% compared to 10% in Cedar park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Marana at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marana | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 21.9% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 12.0% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 28.4% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marana vs Cedar park
- More residents in Marana report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar park at 24.1% versus 21.9% in Marana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Marana at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Marana at 19.1% compared to 17.9% in Cedar park.
- Cedar park has higher obesity rates at 31.0% compared to 28.4% in Marana.
- Disability percentages are higher in Marana at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Cedar park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marana | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (369) | 0.4% (287) |
| High School Diploma | 10.4% (5,802) | 8.9% (6,896) |
| Less than High School | 4.7% (2,658) | 4.1% (3,156) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.0% (17,364) | 35.8% (27,785) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marana vs Cedar park
- A higher percentage of residents in Marana have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Cedar park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marana hold a high school diploma at 10.4% compared to 8.9% in Cedar park.
- More residents in Marana have less than a high school education at 4.7% compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
- In Cedar park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 31.0% in Marana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.