Demographics details for Maquoketa, IA vs Meade, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Maquoketa, IA vs Meade, KS.
| Data | Maquoketa | Meade |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,054 | 3,897 |
| Median Age | 40.8 years | 37.7 years |
| Median Income | $53,462 | $74,063 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Maquoketa vs Meade
- In Maquoketa, the population is higher at 6,054, compared to 3,897 in Meade.
- Residents in Maquoketa have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 37.7 years in Meade.
- Meade has a higher median income of $74,063, compared to $53,462 in Maquoketa.
- In Meade, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 38.0% in Maquoketa.
- Maquoketa has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 9% in Meade.
- The unemployment rate in Maquoketa is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.9% in Meade.
Demographics
Demographics Maquoketa vs Meade provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Maquoketa | Meade |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 96 | 69 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Maquoketa vs Meade
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Maquoketa at 2% compared to 1% in Meade.
- Maquoketa has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 69% in Meade.
- In Meade, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Maquoketa.
- Meade has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 1% in Maquoketa.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Meade at 6%, compared to 1% in Maquoketa.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Maquoketa and Meade at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Maquoketa | Meade |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 22.0% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.7% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 39.8% | 40.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Maquoketa vs Meade
- More residents in Maquoketa report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.8% in Meade.
- Depression is more prevalent in Maquoketa at 20.5% compared to 20.0% in Meade.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Maquoketa at 22.0% compared to 18.2% in Meade.
- Binge drinking is more common in Maquoketa at 20.7% compared to 18.8% in Meade.
- Meade has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 39.8% in Maquoketa.
- Disability percentages are higher in Maquoketa at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Meade.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Maquoketa | Meade |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (12) | 0.2% (9) |
| High School Diploma | 28.0% (1,696) | 13.7% (532) |
| Less than High School | 5.3% (323) | 18.0% (701) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (673) | 15.9% (619) |
Education Levels Comparison: Maquoketa vs Meade
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Maquoketa and Meade at 0.2%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Maquoketa hold a high school diploma at 28.0% compared to 13.7% in Meade.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Meade at 18.0%, compared to 5.3% in Maquoketa.
- In Meade, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 11.1% in Maquoketa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.