Demographics details for Maquoketa, IA vs Ladson, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Maquoketa, IA vs Ladson, SC.
| Data | Maquoketa | Ladson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,054 | 15,298 |
| Median Age | 40.8 years | 34.7 years |
| Median Income | $53,462 | $74,020 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Maquoketa vs Ladson
- The population in Ladson is higher at 15,298, compared to 6,054 in Maquoketa.
- Residents in Maquoketa have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 34.7 years in Ladson.
- Ladson has a higher median income of $74,020, compared to $53,462 in Maquoketa.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Maquoketa at 38.0% compared to 32.0% in Ladson.
- Maquoketa has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Ladson.
- Ladson has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Maquoketa.
Demographics
Demographics Maquoketa vs Ladson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Maquoketa | Ladson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 29 |
| White | 96 | 49 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Maquoketa vs Ladson
- In Ladson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 2% in Maquoketa.
- Maquoketa has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 49% in Ladson.
- In Ladson, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Maquoketa.
- Ladson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 1% in Maquoketa.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ladson at 8%, compared to 1% in Maquoketa.
- In Ladson, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Maquoketa.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Maquoketa | Ladson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 19.4% |
| Smoking | 22.0% | 17.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.7% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 39.8% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Maquoketa vs Ladson
- More residents in Maquoketa report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.4% in Ladson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Maquoketa at 20.5% compared to 19.4% in Ladson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Maquoketa at 22.0% compared to 17.1% in Ladson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Maquoketa at 20.7% compared to 19.4% in Ladson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Maquoketa at 39.8% compared to 38.5% in Ladson.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Maquoketa and Ladson at 16.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Maquoketa | Ladson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (12) | 0.7% (105) |
| High School Diploma | 28.0% (1,696) | 14.0% (2,141) |
| Less than High School | 5.3% (323) | 13.9% (2,130) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (673) | 13.5% (2,065) |
Education Levels Comparison: Maquoketa vs Ladson
- In Ladson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Maquoketa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Maquoketa hold a high school diploma at 28.0% compared to 14.0% in Ladson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ladson at 13.9%, compared to 5.3% in Maquoketa.
- In Ladson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.5% compared to 11.1% in Maquoketa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.