Demographics details for Maquoketa, IA vs Grafton, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Maquoketa, IA vs Grafton, WI.
| Data | Maquoketa | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,054 | 12,433 |
| Median Age | 40.8 years | 43.8 years |
| Median Income | $53,462 | $83,500 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Maquoketa vs Grafton
- The population in Grafton is higher at 12,433, compared to 6,054 in Maquoketa.
- The median age in Grafton is higher at 43.8 years, compared to 40.8 years in Maquoketa.
- Grafton has a higher median income of $83,500, compared to $53,462 in Maquoketa.
- In Grafton, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 38.0% in Maquoketa.
- Maquoketa has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 4% in Grafton.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Maquoketa and Grafton at 3.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Maquoketa vs Grafton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Maquoketa | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 96 | 87 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Maquoketa vs Grafton
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Maquoketa and Grafton at 2%.
- Maquoketa has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 87% in Grafton.
- In Grafton, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Maquoketa.
- Grafton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Maquoketa.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grafton at 5%, compared to 1% in Maquoketa.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Maquoketa and Grafton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Maquoketa | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 7.9% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 22.0% | 11.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.7% | 25.5% |
| Obesity | 39.8% | 28.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Maquoketa vs Grafton
- More residents in Maquoketa report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 13.2% in Grafton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grafton at 21.0% versus 20.5% in Maquoketa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Maquoketa at 22.0% compared to 11.6% in Grafton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grafton at 25.5% compared to 20.7% in Maquoketa.
- Obesity rates are higher in Maquoketa at 39.8% compared to 28.5% in Grafton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Maquoketa at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Grafton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Maquoketa | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (12) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 28.0% (1,696) | 12.9% (1,600) |
| Less than High School | 5.3% (323) | 3.1% (384) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (673) | 31.8% (3,959) |
Education Levels Comparison: Maquoketa vs Grafton
- A higher percentage of residents in Maquoketa have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Grafton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Maquoketa hold a high school diploma at 28.0% compared to 12.9% in Grafton.
- More residents in Maquoketa have less than a high school education at 5.3% compared to 3.1% in Grafton.
- In Grafton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 11.1% in Maquoketa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.