Demographics details for Maple valley, WA vs Logansport, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Maple valley, WA vs Logansport, IN.

Data Maple valley Logansport
Population 28,220 18,194
Median Age 36.4 years 37.3 years
Median Income $137,595 $45,335
Married Families 47.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 4.5

Population Comparison: Maple valley vs Logansport

  • In Maple valley, the population is higher at 28,220, compared to 18,194 in Logansport.
  • The median age in Logansport is higher at 37.3 years, compared to 36.4 years in Maple valley.
  • Maple valley has a higher median income of $137,595 compared to $45,335 in Logansport.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Maple valley at 47.0% compared to 32.0% in Logansport.
  • The poverty level is higher in Logansport at 12%, compared to 0% in Maple valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Maple valley is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.5% in Logansport.

Demographics

Demographics Maple valley vs Logansport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Maple valley Logansport
Black 2 2
White 74 56
Asian 11 2
Hispanic 5 30
Two or More Races 8 9
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Maple valley vs Logansport

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Maple valley and Logansport at 2%.
  • Maple valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 56% in Logansport.
  • The Asian population is larger in Maple valley at 11% compared to 2% in Logansport.
  • Logansport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 5% in Maple valley.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Logansport at 9%, compared to 8% in Maple valley.
  • In Logansport, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Maple valley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Maple valley Logansport
Mental Health Not Good 15.9% 18.9%
Physical Health Not Good 8.6% 14.3%
Depression 25.8% 25.9%
Smoking 9.4% 24.8%
Binge Drinking 19.6% 16.1%
Obesity 24.3% 41.5%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Maple valley vs Logansport

  • In Logansport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 15.9% in Maple valley.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Logansport at 25.9% versus 25.8% in Maple valley.
  • Logansport has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 9.4% in Maple valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Maple valley at 19.6% compared to 16.1% in Logansport.
  • Logansport has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 24.3% in Maple valley.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Logansport at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Maple valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Maple valley Logansport
No Schooling 0.4% (103) 1.4% (262)
High School Diploma 10.2% (2,878) 24.1% (4,392)
Less than High School 3.1% (879) 25.2% (4,582)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 28.5% (8,032) 7.5% (1,364)

Education Levels Comparison: Maple valley vs Logansport

  • In Logansport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.4% in Maple valley.
  • In Logansport, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.1% compared to 10.2% in Maple valley.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Logansport at 25.2%, compared to 3.1% in Maple valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Maple valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 7.5% in Logansport.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.