Demographics details for Maple valley, WA vs Irving, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Maple valley, WA vs Irving, IL.
| Data | Maple valley | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,220 | 370 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 42.1 years |
| Median Income | $137,595 | $50,000 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Maple valley vs Irving
- In Maple valley, the population is higher at 28,220, compared to 370 in Irving.
- The median age in Irving is higher at 42.1 years, compared to 36.4 years in Maple valley.
- Maple valley has a higher median income of $137,595 compared to $50,000 in Irving.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Maple valley at 47.0% compared to 44.0% in Irving.
- The poverty level is higher in Irving at 10%, compared to 0% in Maple valley.
- The unemployment rate in Maple valley is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.5% in Irving.
Demographics
Demographics Maple valley vs Irving provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Maple valley | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 74 | 91 |
| Asian | 11 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Maple valley vs Irving
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Maple valley at 2% compared to 1% in Irving.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Irving at 91% compared to 74% in Maple valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Maple valley at 11% compared to 0% in Irving.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Maple valley at 5% compared to 4% in Irving.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Maple valley at 8% compared to 4% in Irving.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Maple valley and Irving at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Maple valley | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 9.4% | 22.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 24.3% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Maple valley vs Irving
- In Irving, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.9% in Maple valley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Maple valley at 25.8% compared to 24.0% in Irving.
- Irving has a higher smoking rate at 22.1% compared to 9.4% in Maple valley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Maple valley at 19.6% compared to 17.3% in Irving.
- Irving has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 24.3% in Maple valley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Irving at 20.0% compared to 7.0% in Maple valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Maple valley | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (103) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 10.2% (2,878) | 24.9% (92) |
| Less than High School | 3.1% (879) | 20.5% (76) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.5% (8,032) | 9.2% (34) |
Education Levels Comparison: Maple valley vs Irving
- A higher percentage of residents in Maple valley have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Irving.
- In Irving, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 10.2% in Maple valley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Irving at 20.5%, compared to 3.1% in Maple valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Maple valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 9.2% in Irving.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.