Demographics details for Maple valley, WA vs Fishers, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Maple valley, WA vs Fishers, IN.
| Data | Maple valley | Fishers |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,220 | 101,966 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $137,595 | $126,548 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Maple valley vs Fishers
- The population in Fishers is higher at 101,966, compared to 28,220 in Maple valley.
- The median age in Fishers is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 36.4 years in Maple valley.
- Maple valley has a higher median income of $137,595 compared to $126,548 in Fishers.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Maple valley and Fishers at 47.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Fishers at 5%, compared to 0% in Maple valley.
- The unemployment rate in Maple valley is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.5% in Fishers.
Demographics
Demographics Maple valley vs Fishers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Maple valley | Fishers |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 5 |
| White | 74 | 80 |
| Asian | 11 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Maple valley vs Fishers
- In Fishers, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 2% in Maple valley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fishers at 80% compared to 74% in Maple valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Maple valley at 11% compared to 8% in Fishers.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Maple valley at 5% compared to 3% in Fishers.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Maple valley at 8% compared to 4% in Fishers.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Maple valley and Fishers at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Maple valley | Fishers |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 7.1% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 24.3% | 27.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Maple valley vs Fishers
- More residents in Maple valley report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 12.5% in Fishers.
- Depression is more prevalent in Maple valley at 25.8% compared to 22.2% in Fishers.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Maple valley and Fishers at 9.4%.
- Binge drinking is more common in Maple valley at 19.6% compared to 17.0% in Fishers.
- Fishers has higher obesity rates at 27.8% compared to 24.3% in Maple valley.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Maple valley and Fishers at 7.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Maple valley | Fishers |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (103) | 0.4% (418) |
| High School Diploma | 10.2% (2,878) | 6.5% (6,652) |
| Less than High School | 3.1% (879) | 2.0% (2,037) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.5% (8,032) | 41.2% (42,051) |
Education Levels Comparison: Maple valley vs Fishers
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Maple valley and Fishers at 0.4%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Maple valley hold a high school diploma at 10.2% compared to 6.5% in Fishers.
- More residents in Maple valley have less than a high school education at 3.1% compared to 2.0% in Fishers.
- In Fishers, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 28.5% in Maple valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.