Demographics details for Maple valley, WA vs Doniphan, NE

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Maple valley, WA vs Doniphan, NE.

Data Maple valley Doniphan
Population 28,220 810
Median Age 36.4 years 41.0 years
Median Income $137,595 $75,357
Married Families 47.0% 61.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 2.5

Population Comparison: Maple valley vs Doniphan

  • In Maple valley, the population is higher at 28,220, compared to 810 in Doniphan.
  • The median age in Doniphan is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 36.4 years in Maple valley.
  • Maple valley has a higher median income of $137,595 compared to $75,357 in Doniphan.
  • In Doniphan, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 47.0% in Maple valley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Doniphan at 9%, compared to 0% in Maple valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Maple valley is higher at 4.7%, compared to 2.5% in Doniphan.

Demographics

Demographics Maple valley vs Doniphan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Maple valley Doniphan
Black 2 Data is updating
White 74 92
Asian 11 Data is updating
Hispanic 5 6
Two or More Races 8 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Maple valley vs Doniphan

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Maple valley at 2% compared to 0% in Doniphan.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Doniphan at 92% compared to 74% in Maple valley.
  • The Asian population is larger in Maple valley at 11% compared to 0% in Doniphan.
  • Doniphan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Maple valley.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Maple valley at 8% compared to 2% in Doniphan.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Maple valley and Doniphan at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Maple valley Doniphan
Mental Health Not Good 15.9% 13.2%
Physical Health Not Good 8.6% 8.8%
Depression 25.8% 17.1%
Smoking 9.4% 14.4%
Binge Drinking 19.6% 20.2%
Obesity 24.3% 37.6%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Maple valley vs Doniphan

  • More residents in Maple valley report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 13.2% in Doniphan.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Maple valley at 25.8% compared to 17.1% in Doniphan.
  • Doniphan has a higher smoking rate at 14.4% compared to 9.4% in Maple valley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Doniphan at 20.2% compared to 19.6% in Maple valley.
  • Doniphan has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 24.3% in Maple valley.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Doniphan at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Maple valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Maple valley Doniphan
No Schooling 0.4% (103) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 10.2% (2,878) 38.0% (308)
Less than High School 3.1% (879) 4.4% (36)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 28.5% (8,032) 12.5% (101)

Education Levels Comparison: Maple valley vs Doniphan

  • A higher percentage of residents in Maple valley have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Doniphan.
  • In Doniphan, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 38.0% compared to 10.2% in Maple valley.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Doniphan at 4.4%, compared to 3.1% in Maple valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Maple valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 12.5% in Doniphan.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.