Demographics details for Maple falls, WA vs Wallace, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Maple falls, WA vs Wallace, SC.
Data | Maple falls | Wallace |
---|---|---|
Population | 231 | 662 |
Median Age | 61.4 years | 59.8 years |
Median Income | $32,226 | $19,423 |
Married Families | 49.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 22% |
Unemployment Rate | Data is updating | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Maple falls vs Wallace
- The population in Wallace is higher at 662, compared to 231 in Maple falls.
- Residents in Maple falls have a higher median age of 61.4 years compared to 59.8 years in Wallace.
- Maple falls has a higher median income of $32,226 compared to $19,423 in Wallace.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Maple falls at 49.0% compared to 35.0% in Wallace.
- The poverty level is higher in Wallace at 22%, compared to 0% in Maple falls.
- Wallace has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 0.0% in Maple falls.
Demographics
Demographics Maple falls vs Wallace provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Maple falls | Wallace |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 42 |
White | 94 | 44 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Maple falls vs Wallace
- In Wallace, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 0% in Maple falls.
- Maple falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 44% in Wallace.
- Both Maple falls and Wallace have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Maple falls at 6% compared to 0% in Wallace.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Wallace at 10%, compared to 0% in Maple falls.
- In Wallace, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Maple falls.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Maple falls | Wallace |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 20.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 15.0% |
Depression | 31.8% | 22.5% |
Smoking | 19.6% | 25.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 15.6% |
Obesity | 28.1% | 41.2% |
Disability Percentage | 68.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Maple falls vs Wallace
- In Wallace, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 19.5% in Maple falls.
- Depression is more prevalent in Maple falls at 31.8% compared to 22.5% in Wallace.
- Wallace has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 19.6% in Maple falls.
- Binge drinking is more common in Maple falls at 17.9% compared to 15.6% in Wallace.
- Wallace has higher obesity rates at 41.2% compared to 28.1% in Maple falls.
- Disability percentages are higher in Maple falls at 68.0% compared to 28.0% in Wallace.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Maple falls | Wallace |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.5% (10) |
High School Diploma | 40.7% (94) | 57.4% (380) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 28.2% (187) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (20) | 1.1% (7) |
Education Levels Comparison: Maple falls vs Wallace
- In Wallace, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Maple falls.
- In Wallace, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 57.4% compared to 40.7% in Maple falls.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wallace at 28.2%, compared to 0.0% in Maple falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Maple falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.7% compared to 1.1% in Wallace.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.