Demographics details for Maple falls, WA vs Springboro, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Maple falls, WA vs Springboro, OH.

Data Maple falls Springboro
Population 231 19,427
Median Age 61.4 years 37.7 years
Median Income $32,226 $113,182
Married Families 49.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 3%
Unemployment Rate Data is updating 3.2

Population Comparison: Maple falls vs Springboro

  • The population in Springboro is higher at 19,427, compared to 231 in Maple falls.
  • Residents in Maple falls have a higher median age of 61.4 years compared to 37.7 years in Springboro.
  • Springboro has a higher median income of $113,182, compared to $32,226 in Maple falls.
  • In Springboro, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 49.0% in Maple falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Springboro at 3%, compared to 0% in Maple falls.
  • Springboro has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 0.0% in Maple falls.

Demographics

Demographics Maple falls vs Springboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Maple falls Springboro
Black Data is updating 2
White 94 89
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 6 3
Two or More Races Data is updating 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Maple falls vs Springboro

  • In Springboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Maple falls.
  • Maple falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 89% in Springboro.
  • In Springboro, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Maple falls.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Maple falls at 6% compared to 3% in Springboro.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Springboro at 4%, compared to 0% in Maple falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Maple falls and Springboro at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Maple falls Springboro
Mental Health Not Good 19.5% 14.2%
Physical Health Not Good 13.3% 8.4%
Depression 31.8% 21.1%
Smoking 19.6% 12.7%
Binge Drinking 17.9% 20.0%
Obesity 28.1% 34.4%
Disability Percentage 68.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Maple falls vs Springboro

  • More residents in Maple falls report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 14.2% in Springboro.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Maple falls at 31.8% compared to 21.1% in Springboro.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Maple falls at 19.6% compared to 12.7% in Springboro.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Springboro at 20.0% compared to 17.9% in Maple falls.
  • Springboro has higher obesity rates at 34.4% compared to 28.1% in Maple falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Maple falls at 68.0% compared to 7.0% in Springboro.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Maple falls Springboro
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 40.7% (94) 10.7% (2,072)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.8% (539)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.7% (20) 35.4% (6,871)

Education Levels Comparison: Maple falls vs Springboro

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Maple falls and Springboro at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Maple falls hold a high school diploma at 40.7% compared to 10.7% in Springboro.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Springboro at 2.8%, compared to 0.0% in Maple falls.
  • In Springboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 8.7% in Maple falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.