Environment details: Maple falls WA
Good quality; ongoing monitoring shows consistency.
Environment details: Kankakee IL
Quality below average; requires ongoing efforts.
Compare Environment: Maple falls WA vs Kankakee IL
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
Metric | Maple falls | Kankakee |
---|---|---|
CO2 Emissions | 590 | 1474 |
Water Quality | 7/10 | 4/10 |
Water Quality Explanation | Good quality; ongoing monitoring shows consistency. | Quality below average; requires ongoing efforts. |
Median Air Quality | 1.0 | 2.0 |
Average Air Quality Index | 1.43 | 1.77 |
Worst AQI | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Days with Poor AQI | 19 | 44 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Maple falls vs Kankakee
- Water quality is rated higher in Maple falls at 7/10 compared to 4/10 in Kankakee.
- Kankakee has a better median air quality index at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Maple falls.
- Air quality is better in Kankakee with an average index of 1.77 compared to 1.43 in Maple falls.
- Kankakee experiences more days with poor air quality at 44 compared to 19 in Maple falls.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.