Demographics details for Maple falls, WA vs Blairstown, IA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Maple falls, WA vs Blairstown, IA.

Data Maple falls Blairstown
Population 231 708
Median Age 61.4 years 36.2 years
Median Income $32,226 $66,750
Married Families 49.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 8%
Unemployment Rate Data is updating 3.5

Population Comparison: Maple falls vs Blairstown

  • The population in Blairstown is higher at 708, compared to 231 in Maple falls.
  • Residents in Maple falls have a higher median age of 61.4 years compared to 36.2 years in Blairstown.
  • Blairstown has a higher median income of $66,750, compared to $32,226 in Maple falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Maple falls at 49.0% compared to 45.0% in Blairstown.
  • The poverty level is higher in Blairstown at 8%, compared to 0% in Maple falls.
  • Blairstown has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 0.0% in Maple falls.

Demographics

Demographics Maple falls vs Blairstown provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Maple falls Blairstown
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 94 94
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 6 3
Two or More Races Data is updating 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Maple falls vs Blairstown

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Maple falls and Blairstown at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is the same in both Maple falls and Blairstown at 94%.
  • In Blairstown, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Maple falls.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Maple falls at 6% compared to 3% in Blairstown.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Blairstown at 2%, compared to 0% in Maple falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Maple falls and Blairstown at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Maple falls Blairstown
Mental Health Not Good 19.5% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 13.3% 9.5%
Depression 31.8% 18.2%
Smoking 19.6% 17.5%
Binge Drinking 17.9% 21.9%
Obesity 28.1% 38.8%
Disability Percentage 68.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Maple falls vs Blairstown

  • More residents in Maple falls report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 15.4% in Blairstown.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Maple falls at 31.8% compared to 18.2% in Blairstown.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Maple falls at 19.6% compared to 17.5% in Blairstown.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Blairstown at 21.9% compared to 17.9% in Maple falls.
  • Blairstown has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 28.1% in Maple falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Maple falls at 68.0% compared to 13.0% in Blairstown.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Maple falls Blairstown
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 40.7% (94) 28.7% (203)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 7.3% (52)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.7% (20) 10.3% (73)

Education Levels Comparison: Maple falls vs Blairstown

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Maple falls and Blairstown at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Maple falls hold a high school diploma at 40.7% compared to 28.7% in Blairstown.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Blairstown at 7.3%, compared to 0.0% in Maple falls.
  • In Blairstown, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.3% compared to 8.7% in Maple falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.