Demographics details for Manteca, CA vs New cambria, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Manteca, CA vs New cambria, KS.
| Data | Manteca | New cambria |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 86,928 | 104 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 30.7 years |
| Median Income | $89,966 | $83,601 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Manteca vs New cambria
- In Manteca, the population is higher at 86,928, compared to 104 in New cambria.
- Residents in Manteca have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 30.7 years in New cambria.
- Manteca has a higher median income of $89,966 compared to $83,601 in New cambria.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Manteca at 38.0% compared to 32.0% in New cambria.
- Manteca has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in New cambria.
- The unemployment rate in Manteca is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.2% in New cambria.
Demographics
Demographics Manteca vs New cambria provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Manteca | New cambria |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 26 | 96 |
| Asian | 14 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 39 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Manteca vs New cambria
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Manteca at 3% compared to 0% in New cambria.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in New cambria at 96% compared to 26% in Manteca.
- The Asian population is larger in Manteca at 14% compared to 2% in New cambria.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Manteca at 39% compared to 1% in New cambria.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Manteca at 17% compared to 1% in New cambria.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Manteca at 1% compared to 0% in New cambria.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Manteca | New cambria |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 18.2% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 13.8% | 16.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 20.0% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Manteca vs New cambria
- More residents in Manteca report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 14.3% in New cambria.
- Higher depression rates are seen in New cambria at 20.8% versus 18.2% in Manteca.
- New cambria has a higher smoking rate at 16.5% compared to 13.8% in Manteca.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in New cambria at 20.0% compared to 16.6% in Manteca.
- Obesity rates are higher in Manteca at 34.1% compared to 33.7% in New cambria.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Manteca and New cambria at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Manteca | New cambria |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (1,490) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.0% (14,775) | 18.3% (19) |
| Less than High School | 16.5% (14,304) | 3.8% (4) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.4% (10,753) | 8.7% (9) |
Education Levels Comparison: Manteca vs New cambria
- A higher percentage of residents in Manteca have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in New cambria.
- In New cambria, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 17.0% in Manteca.
- More residents in Manteca have less than a high school education at 16.5% compared to 3.8% in New cambria.
- A higher percentage of residents in Manteca hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.4% compared to 8.7% in New cambria.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.