Demographics details for Manteca, CA vs Falconer, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Manteca, CA vs Falconer, NY.

Data Manteca Falconer
Population 86,928 2,262
Median Age 37.0 years 46.4 years
Median Income $89,966 $50,625
Married Families 38.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 10% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.7 4.5

Population Comparison: Manteca vs Falconer

  • In Manteca, the population is higher at 86,928, compared to 2,262 in Falconer.
  • The median age in Falconer is higher at 46.4 years, compared to 37.0 years in Manteca.
  • Manteca has a higher median income of $89,966 compared to $50,625 in Falconer.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Manteca at 38.0% compared to 37.0% in Falconer.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Manteca and Falconer at 10%.
  • The unemployment rate in Manteca is higher at 5.7%, compared to 4.5% in Falconer.

Demographics

Demographics Manteca vs Falconer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Manteca Falconer
Black 3 Data is updating
White 26 99
Asian 14 Data is updating
Hispanic 39 Data is updating
Two or More Races 17 1
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Manteca vs Falconer

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Manteca at 3% compared to 0% in Falconer.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Falconer at 99% compared to 26% in Manteca.
  • The Asian population is larger in Manteca at 14% compared to 0% in Falconer.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Manteca at 39% compared to 0% in Falconer.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Manteca at 17% compared to 1% in Falconer.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Manteca at 1% compared to 0% in Falconer.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Manteca Falconer
Mental Health Not Good 16.6% 16.9%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 11.6%
Depression 18.2% 26.7%
Smoking 13.8% 21.4%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 18.6%
Obesity 34.1% 36.5%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 23.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Manteca vs Falconer

  • In Falconer, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.6% in Manteca.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Falconer at 26.7% versus 18.2% in Manteca.
  • Falconer has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 13.8% in Manteca.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Falconer at 18.6% compared to 16.6% in Manteca.
  • Falconer has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 34.1% in Manteca.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Falconer at 23.0% compared to 12.0% in Manteca.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Manteca Falconer
No Schooling 1.7% (1,490) 0.2% (5)
High School Diploma 17.0% (14,775) 20.2% (458)
Less than High School 16.5% (14,304) 13.0% (294)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.4% (10,753) 10.5% (237)

Education Levels Comparison: Manteca vs Falconer

  • A higher percentage of residents in Manteca have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.2% in Falconer.
  • In Falconer, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 17.0% in Manteca.
  • More residents in Manteca have less than a high school education at 16.5% compared to 13.0% in Falconer.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Manteca hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.4% compared to 10.5% in Falconer.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.