Demographics details for Manteca, CA vs Chickasha, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Manteca, CA vs Chickasha, OK.
| Data | Manteca | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 86,928 | 16,549 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $89,966 | $55,136 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Manteca vs Chickasha
- In Manteca, the population is higher at 86,928, compared to 16,549 in Chickasha.
- Residents in Manteca have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Manteca has a higher median income of $89,966 compared to $55,136 in Chickasha.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Manteca at 38.0% compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
- The poverty level is higher in Chickasha at 17%, compared to 10% in Manteca.
- The unemployment rate in Manteca is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Manteca vs Chickasha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Manteca | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 6 |
| White | 26 | 71 |
| Asian | 14 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 39 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Manteca vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 3% in Manteca.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chickasha at 71% compared to 26% in Manteca.
- The Asian population is larger in Manteca at 14% compared to 0% in Chickasha.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Manteca at 39% compared to 8% in Chickasha.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Manteca at 17% compared to 11% in Chickasha.
- In Chickasha, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 1% in Manteca.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Manteca | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 18.2% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 13.8% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Manteca vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.6% in Manteca.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chickasha at 25.4% versus 18.2% in Manteca.
- Chickasha has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 13.8% in Manteca.
- Binge drinking is more common in Manteca at 16.6% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 34.1% in Manteca.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Manteca.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Manteca | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (1,490) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 17.0% (14,775) | 22.5% (3,730) |
| Less than High School | 16.5% (14,304) | 13.1% (2,160) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.4% (10,753) | 12.5% (2,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Manteca vs Chickasha
- A higher percentage of residents in Manteca have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.5% in Chickasha.
- In Chickasha, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.5% compared to 17.0% in Manteca.
- More residents in Manteca have less than a high school education at 16.5% compared to 13.1% in Chickasha.
- In Chickasha, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 12.4% in Manteca.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.