Demographics details for Manteca, CA vs Andrews, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Manteca, CA vs Andrews, TX.
Data | Manteca | Andrews |
---|---|---|
Population | 86,928 | 13,276 |
Median Age | 37.0 years | 31.9 years |
Median Income | $89,966 | $86,806 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Manteca vs Andrews
- In Manteca, the population is higher at 86,928, compared to 13,276 in Andrews.
- Residents in Manteca have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 31.9 years in Andrews.
- Manteca has a higher median income of $89,966 compared to $86,806 in Andrews.
- In Andrews, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 38.0% in Manteca.
- The poverty level is identical in both Manteca and Andrews at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Manteca is higher at 5.7%, compared to 4.5% in Andrews.
Demographics
Demographics Manteca vs Andrews provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Manteca | Andrews |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 3 |
White | 26 | 26 |
Asian | 14 | 1 |
Hispanic | 39 | 54 |
Two or More Races | 17 | 16 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Manteca vs Andrews
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Manteca and Andrews at 3%.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Manteca and Andrews at 26%.
- The Asian population is larger in Manteca at 14% compared to 1% in Andrews.
- Andrews has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 54%, compared to 39% in Manteca.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Manteca at 17% compared to 16% in Andrews.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Manteca at 1% compared to 0% in Andrews.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Manteca | Andrews |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 17.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 12.8% |
Depression | 18.2% | 23.1% |
Smoking | 13.8% | 17.5% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 34.1% | 38.4% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Manteca vs Andrews
- In Andrews, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.6% in Manteca.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Andrews at 23.1% versus 18.2% in Manteca.
- Andrews has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 13.8% in Manteca.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Andrews at 17.9% compared to 16.6% in Manteca.
- Andrews has higher obesity rates at 38.4% compared to 34.1% in Manteca.
- Disability percentages are higher in Manteca at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Andrews.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Manteca | Andrews |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (1,490) | 3.2% (428) |
High School Diploma | 17.0% (14,775) | 15.6% (2,070) |
Less than High School | 16.5% (14,304) | 27.9% (3,710) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.4% (10,753) | 13.4% (1,773) |
Education Levels Comparison: Manteca vs Andrews
- In Andrews, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 1.7% in Manteca.
- A higher percentage of residents in Manteca hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 15.6% in Andrews.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Andrews at 27.9%, compared to 16.5% in Manteca.
- In Andrews, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 12.4% in Manteca.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.