Demographics details for Mansfield, TX vs Ute, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mansfield, TX vs Ute, IA.
| Data | Mansfield | Ute |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 76,724 | 329 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $112,465 | $51,250 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Mansfield vs Ute
- In Mansfield, the population is higher at 76,724, compared to 329 in Ute.
- The median age in Ute is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 37.3 years in Mansfield.
- Mansfield has a higher median income of $112,465 compared to $51,250 in Ute.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mansfield at 42.0% compared to 27.0% in Ute.
- The poverty level is higher in Ute at 9%, compared to 6% in Mansfield.
- The unemployment rate in Mansfield is higher at 4.1%, compared to 2.2% in Ute.
Demographics
Demographics Mansfield vs Ute provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mansfield | Ute |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | Data is updating |
| White | 49 | 99 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mansfield vs Ute
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mansfield at 22% compared to 0% in Ute.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ute at 99% compared to 49% in Mansfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Mansfield at 4% compared to 0% in Ute.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mansfield at 16% compared to 1% in Ute.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mansfield at 9% compared to 0% in Ute.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mansfield and Ute at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mansfield | Ute |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 12.5% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 21.4% |
| Obesity | 31.9% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mansfield vs Ute
- In Ute, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.1% in Mansfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mansfield at 22.2% compared to 19.9% in Ute.
- Ute has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 12.5% in Mansfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ute at 21.4% compared to 18.4% in Mansfield.
- Ute has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 31.9% in Mansfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ute at 24.0% compared to 8.0% in Mansfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mansfield | Ute |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (302) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 9.6% (7,338) | 31.0% (102) |
| Less than High School | 5.5% (4,243) | 8.5% (28) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.5% (19,574) | 7.0% (23) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mansfield vs Ute
- A higher percentage of residents in Mansfield have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Ute.
- In Ute, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.0% compared to 9.6% in Mansfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ute at 8.5%, compared to 5.5% in Mansfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mansfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.5% compared to 7.0% in Ute.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.