Demographics details for Mansfield, TX vs Ash fork, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mansfield, TX vs Ash fork, AZ.
| Data | Mansfield | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 76,724 | 466 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $112,465 | $79,861 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Mansfield vs Ash fork
- In Mansfield, the population is higher at 76,724, compared to 466 in Ash fork.
- The median age in Ash fork is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 37.3 years in Mansfield.
- Mansfield has a higher median income of $112,465 compared to $79,861 in Ash fork.
- In Ash fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 42.0% in Mansfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Ash fork at 10%, compared to 6% in Mansfield.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Mansfield and Ash fork at 4.1%.
Demographics
Demographics Mansfield vs Ash fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mansfield | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | Data is updating |
| White | 49 | 79 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mansfield vs Ash fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mansfield at 22% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ash fork at 79% compared to 49% in Mansfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Mansfield at 4% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mansfield at 16% compared to 6% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ash fork at 15%, compared to 9% in Mansfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mansfield and Ash fork at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mansfield | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 12.5% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 31.9% | 30.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mansfield vs Ash fork
- In Ash fork, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.1% in Mansfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mansfield at 22.2% compared to 21.4% in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 12.5% in Mansfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mansfield at 18.4% compared to 15.9% in Ash fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mansfield at 31.9% compared to 30.6% in Ash fork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ash fork at 26.0% compared to 8.0% in Mansfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mansfield | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (302) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 9.6% (7,338) | 13.1% (61) |
| Less than High School | 5.5% (4,243) | 23.6% (110) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.5% (19,574) | 8.8% (41) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mansfield vs Ash fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Mansfield have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Ash fork.
- In Ash fork, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.1% compared to 9.6% in Mansfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ash fork at 23.6%, compared to 5.5% in Mansfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mansfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.5% compared to 8.8% in Ash fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.