Demographics details for Manns choice, PA vs Woodstock, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Manns choice, PA vs Woodstock, GA.

Data Manns choice Woodstock
Population 312 37,350
Median Age 37.1 years 36.4 years
Median Income $47,500 $100,913
Married Families 34.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.4

Population Comparison: Manns choice vs Woodstock

  • The population in Woodstock is higher at 37,350, compared to 312 in Manns choice.
  • Residents in Manns choice have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 36.4 years in Woodstock.
  • Woodstock has a higher median income of $100,913, compared to $47,500 in Manns choice.
  • In Woodstock, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 34.0% in Manns choice.
  • The poverty level is higher in Woodstock at 5%, compared to 0% in Manns choice.
  • Woodstock has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 3.2% in Manns choice.

Demographics

Demographics Manns choice vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Manns choice Woodstock
Black Data is updating 11
White 97 69
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic Data is updating 9
Two or More Races 3 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Manns choice vs Woodstock

  • In Woodstock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 0% in Manns choice.
  • Manns choice has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 69% in Woodstock.
  • In Woodstock, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Manns choice.
  • Woodstock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 0% in Manns choice.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodstock at 8%, compared to 3% in Manns choice.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Manns choice and Woodstock at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Manns choice Woodstock
Mental Health Not Good 17.9% 14.1%
Physical Health Not Good 12.2% 9.4%
Depression 24.1% 20.8%
Smoking 21.7% 12.1%
Binge Drinking 18.8% 16.5%
Obesity 36.7% 30.2%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Manns choice vs Woodstock

  • More residents in Manns choice report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 14.1% in Woodstock.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Manns choice at 24.1% compared to 20.8% in Woodstock.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Manns choice at 21.7% compared to 12.1% in Woodstock.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Manns choice at 18.8% compared to 16.5% in Woodstock.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Manns choice at 36.7% compared to 30.2% in Woodstock.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodstock at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Manns choice.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Manns choice Woodstock
No Schooling 1.0% (3) 0.3% (107)
High School Diploma 31.4% (98) 8.2% (3,052)
Less than High School 11.5% (36) 3.7% (1,375)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 1.0% (3) 32.9% (12,290)

Education Levels Comparison: Manns choice vs Woodstock

  • A higher percentage of residents in Manns choice have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Woodstock.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Manns choice hold a high school diploma at 31.4% compared to 8.2% in Woodstock.
  • More residents in Manns choice have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 3.7% in Woodstock.
  • In Woodstock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.9% compared to 1.0% in Manns choice.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.