Demographics details for Manns choice, PA vs Jurupa valley, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Manns choice, PA vs Jurupa valley, CA.

Data Manns choice Jurupa valley
Population 312 107,609
Median Age 37.1 years 33.5 years
Median Income $47,500 $91,562
Married Families 34.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.9

Population Comparison: Manns choice vs Jurupa valley

  • The population in Jurupa valley is higher at 107,609, compared to 312 in Manns choice.
  • Residents in Manns choice have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 33.5 years in Jurupa valley.
  • Jurupa valley has a higher median income of $91,562, compared to $47,500 in Manns choice.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Manns choice and Jurupa valley at 34.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Jurupa valley at 12%, compared to 0% in Manns choice.
  • Jurupa valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.2% in Manns choice.

Demographics

Demographics Manns choice vs Jurupa valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Manns choice Jurupa valley
Black Data is updating 3
White 97 8
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic Data is updating 71
Two or More Races 3 13
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Manns choice vs Jurupa valley

  • In Jurupa valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Manns choice.
  • Manns choice has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
  • In Jurupa valley, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Manns choice.
  • Jurupa valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 71%, compared to 0% in Manns choice.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jurupa valley at 13%, compared to 3% in Manns choice.
  • In Jurupa valley, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Manns choice.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Manns choice Jurupa valley
Mental Health Not Good 17.9% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 12.2% 13.3%
Depression 24.1% 17.4%
Smoking 21.7% 14.6%
Binge Drinking 18.8% 16.1%
Obesity 36.7% 38.4%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Manns choice vs Jurupa valley

  • More residents in Manns choice report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.7% in Jurupa valley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Manns choice at 24.1% compared to 17.4% in Jurupa valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Manns choice at 21.7% compared to 14.6% in Jurupa valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Manns choice at 18.8% compared to 16.1% in Jurupa valley.
  • Jurupa valley has higher obesity rates at 38.4% compared to 36.7% in Manns choice.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jurupa valley at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Manns choice.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Manns choice Jurupa valley
No Schooling 1.0% (3) 3.1% (3,376)
High School Diploma 31.4% (98) 17.3% (18,582)
Less than High School 11.5% (36) 34.3% (36,892)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 1.0% (3) 9.0% (9,706)

Education Levels Comparison: Manns choice vs Jurupa valley

  • In Jurupa valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.0% in Manns choice.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Manns choice hold a high school diploma at 31.4% compared to 17.3% in Jurupa valley.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jurupa valley at 34.3%, compared to 11.5% in Manns choice.
  • In Jurupa valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.0% compared to 1.0% in Manns choice.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.