Demographics details for Mankato, MN vs Chauncey, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mankato, MN vs Chauncey, OH.
Data | Mankato | Chauncey |
---|---|---|
Population | 45,140 | 949 |
Median Age | 26.5 years | 45.9 years |
Median Income | $61,726 | $33,803 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 24.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Mankato vs Chauncey
- In Mankato, the population is higher at 45,140, compared to 949 in Chauncey.
- The median age in Chauncey is higher at 45.9 years, compared to 26.5 years in Mankato.
- Mankato has a higher median income of $61,726 compared to $33,803 in Chauncey.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mankato at 28.0% compared to 24.0% in Chauncey.
- The poverty level is higher in Chauncey at 12%, compared to 10% in Mankato.
- Chauncey has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.4% in Mankato.
Demographics
Demographics Mankato vs Chauncey provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mankato | Chauncey |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | Data is updating |
White | 81 | 99 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 3 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mankato vs Chauncey
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mankato at 7% compared to 0% in Chauncey.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chauncey at 99% compared to 81% in Mankato.
- The Asian population is larger in Mankato at 4% compared to 0% in Chauncey.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mankato at 5% compared to 0% in Chauncey.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mankato at 3% compared to 1% in Chauncey.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mankato and Chauncey at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mankato | Chauncey |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 14.2% |
Depression | 25.0% | 28.3% |
Smoking | 18.4% | 23.1% |
Binge Drinking | 19.9% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 37.2% | 38.9% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mankato vs Chauncey
- In Chauncey, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 16.0% in Mankato.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chauncey at 28.3% versus 25.0% in Mankato.
- Chauncey has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 18.4% in Mankato.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mankato at 19.9% compared to 17.6% in Chauncey.
- Chauncey has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 37.2% in Mankato.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chauncey at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Mankato.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mankato | Chauncey |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (349) | 1.5% (14) |
High School Diploma | 9.3% (4,187) | 27.6% (262) |
Less than High School | 5.7% (2,556) | 19.9% (189) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (8,847) | 7.1% (67) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mankato vs Chauncey
- In Chauncey, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.8% in Mankato.
- In Chauncey, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.6% compared to 9.3% in Mankato.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chauncey at 19.9%, compared to 5.7% in Mankato.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mankato hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 7.1% in Chauncey.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.