Demographics details for Manitou springs, CO vs Heppner, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Manitou springs, CO vs Heppner, OR.

Data Manitou springs Heppner
Population 4,710 1,172
Median Age 44.1 years 39.1 years
Median Income $72,775 $46,708
Married Families 44.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 10% 10%
Unemployment Rate 6.1 5.7

Population Comparison: Manitou springs vs Heppner

  • In Manitou springs, the population is higher at 4,710, compared to 1,172 in Heppner.
  • Residents in Manitou springs have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 39.1 years in Heppner.
  • Manitou springs has a higher median income of $72,775 compared to $46,708 in Heppner.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Manitou springs at 44.0% compared to 43.0% in Heppner.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Manitou springs and Heppner at 10%.
  • The unemployment rate in Manitou springs is higher at 6.1%, compared to 5.7% in Heppner.

Demographics

Demographics Manitou springs vs Heppner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Manitou springs Heppner
Black 1 1
White 85 86
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 8 6
Two or More Races 2 7
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Manitou springs vs Heppner

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Manitou springs and Heppner at 1%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Heppner at 86% compared to 85% in Manitou springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Manitou springs at 2% compared to 0% in Heppner.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Manitou springs at 8% compared to 6% in Heppner.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Heppner at 7%, compared to 2% in Manitou springs.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Manitou springs at 2% compared to 0% in Heppner.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Manitou springs Heppner
Mental Health Not Good 14.8% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good 9.1% 11.2%
Depression 25.3% 27.6%
Smoking 11.9% 16.2%
Binge Drinking 17.2% 18.2%
Obesity 25.7% 34.4%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 35.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Manitou springs vs Heppner

  • In Heppner, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 14.8% in Manitou springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Heppner at 27.6% versus 25.3% in Manitou springs.
  • Heppner has a higher smoking rate at 16.2% compared to 11.9% in Manitou springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Heppner at 18.2% compared to 17.2% in Manitou springs.
  • Heppner has higher obesity rates at 34.4% compared to 25.7% in Manitou springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Heppner at 35.0% compared to 13.0% in Manitou springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Manitou springs Heppner
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 9.7% (456) 22.0% (258)
Less than High School 5.9% (278) 9.4% (110)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 43.1% (2,031) 9.8% (115)

Education Levels Comparison: Manitou springs vs Heppner

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Manitou springs and Heppner at 0.0%.
  • In Heppner, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 9.7% in Manitou springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Heppner at 9.4%, compared to 5.9% in Manitou springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Manitou springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.1% compared to 9.8% in Heppner.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.